Litigation and Trial
Overview
Over one-third of Fortune 100 companies turn to Crowell for their litigation and trial needs. Our litigators and trial lawyers help clients across a wide range of industries confront litigation challenges and intelligently protect their business interests.
Our definition of winning is driven by what our clients want to achieve. The foundation of our work is understanding each client's business and goals from the inside out. That knowledge allows us to develop effective strategies that mitigate legal risk, anticipate regulatory challenges, and successfully navigate market forces. That’s why when the stakes are highest, our clients trust us to handle their most critical disputes and achieve the best solutions for their business.
Insights
Event | 02.20.25
Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today
Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.
Event | 12.03.24
Speaking Engagement | 12.03.24
Firm News | 2 min read | 11.25.24
The Los Angeles Times Names Jennifer Romano and Agustin Orozco as Legal Visionaries
Insights
- |
03.29.24
New York Law Journal
Our Understanding of Memory Has Changed, The Rules Of Evidence Have Not
|03.08.24
New York Law Journal
'Cascading Effects' Of Waynesboro Lawsuit In Virginia Could Affect Federal Elections
|10.31.24
Staunton News Leader
Waynesboro: Judge Seems To Tip Hand In Suit Over Nov. 5 Election Certification
|10.29.24
Augusta Free Press
Waynesboro Election Officials Vow To Appeal If Court Forces Them To Certify Election
|10.28.24
The News Virginian
NJEA Summer Leadership Conference - National Black Law Students Association
|07.27.24
"e-Discovery within Law Firms - Finding the Right Fit: Internal Teams vs. Outsourcing vs. Hybrid Models," The Masters Conference - 2024 New York
|07.24.24
2024 American Legion New Jersey Boys State Program
|06.16.24
FTC Updates (April 15 – April 19, 2024)
|04.23.24
Crowell & Moring’s Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer
FTC Updates (April 8 – April 12, 2024)
|04.18.24
Crowell & Moring’s Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer
FTC Updates (March 18 – 29, 2024)
|04.17.24
Crowell & Moring’s Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer
FTC Updates (March 11–15, 2024)
|03.22.24
Crowell & Moring’s Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer
PFAS Litigation: Another Headache for the Beauty Industry
|02.27.24
Crowell & Moring’s Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer
FTC Updates (January 29 – February 2, 2024)
|02.07.24
Crowell & Moring’s Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer
FTC Updates (October 09 – October 13, 2023)
|10.20.23
Crowell & Moring’s Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer
FTC Updates (August 28 – September 8, 2023)
|10.05.23
Crowell & Moring’s Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer
FTC Updates (August 7-25, 2023)
|10.05.23
Crowell & Moring’s Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer
Professionals
Insights
Event | 02.20.25
Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today
Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.
Event | 12.03.24
Speaking Engagement | 12.03.24
Firm News | 2 min read | 11.25.24
The Los Angeles Times Names Jennifer Romano and Agustin Orozco as Legal Visionaries
Practices
- Antitrust and Competition
- Tax Controversy
- Administrative Law
- Advertising and Brand Protection
- Appellate
- Class Action Defense
- E-Discovery and Information Management
- Environment and Natural Resources
- False Claims Act Defense
- Government Contracts
- Infrastructure
- Insurance / Reinsurance
- Intellectual Property
- International Dispute Resolution
- Labor and Employment
- Mass Tort, Product, and Consumer Litigation
- National Coordinating Counsel and Complex Litigation
- Privacy and Cybersecurity
- Recovery
- State Attorneys General
- Tax
- Trade Secrets
- White Collar and Regulatory Enforcement
Insights
Event | 02.20.25
Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today
Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.
Event | 12.03.24
Speaking Engagement | 12.03.24
Firm News | 2 min read | 11.25.24
The Los Angeles Times Names Jennifer Romano and Agustin Orozco as Legal Visionaries