1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Consumer Products: Microplastics Are Ubiquitous. So, Increasingly, Are the Class Action Suits They’re Spawning

Consumer Products: Microplastics Are Ubiquitous. So, Increasingly, Are the Class Action Suits They’re Spawning

Publication | 01.15.25

In August 2024 judge’s decision to dismiss a major class action claim against bottled water makers will likely do little to stem the flow of microplastics litigation in the year ahead, says Meshach Rhoades, managing partner of Crowell & Moring’s Denver office.

Plaintiffs in the case had claimed that the company behind Ice Mountain bottled water violated the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act when it used the wording “100% Natural” on its labeling, even though the water was actually found to contain microplastics—particles of less than 5 mm that can be shed by plastic bottle material.

But a federal judge roundly—and somewhat humorously—rejected the claim, on the grounds it was preempted by the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which gives the Food and Drug Administration exclusive authority to define certain terms, including “spring water.” Plaintiffs also failed to meet the “reasonable consumer” standard under the law, he said.

“No reasonable consumer would think that a bottle of water wasn’t a bottle of water because it contained infinitesimally small amounts of microplastics,” wrote Judge Steven Seeger of the Northern District of Illinois. “The claim doesn’t hold water.”

However, a raft of similar bottled water class actions remains in other, more plaintiff-friendly jurisdictions, such as New York and California, says Rhoades. In addition, plaintiffs’ lawyers have begun targeting other products, including baby bottles.

Several false advertising class actions have been filed against baby bottle makers by plaintiffs who found microplastics leached into infant formula that had been warmed in bottles labeled free of bisphenol A, also known as BPA.

Spreading Beyond Water

While the FDA banned the use of BPA—a chemical used in the making of some plastics—in 2012, plaintiffs claim defendants created a false sense of security for consumers with their “BPA Free” label wording and caused them to assume the bottles were free of all types of microplastics.

Rhoades says she expects plaintiffs’ attorneys to take aim at makers of others beverages besides water that are bottled in plastic. “I think we’ll see it spread to just about everything,” she says. “Supplements with certain types of coatings, processed, and even non-processed foods.”

Still, Rhoades does not recommend that manufacturers rush to make radical changes to their labeling, such as adding a “may contain microplastics” warning—as has been suggested by plaintiffs’ attorneys.

It would be incredibly hard to argue that the standard should be zero concentration. But what concentration would be ‘reasonable’? That’s still a question.

— Meshach Rhoades

Rhoades notes that they should instead watch closely as a “reasonable consumer standard” in microplastics cases becomes clearer. “Microplastics are so ubiquitous,” she says. “It would be incredibly hard to argue that the standard should be zero concentration. But what concentration would be ‘reasonable’? That’s still a question.”

Monitoring the Research

Moreover, Rhoades says, the science is still developing on whether microplastics are harmful in the small amounts found in water, food, and beverages. Plaintiffs have offered studies that claim to show an association between microplastics and negative health outcomes, such as heart disease and male infertility.

However, after a comprehensive review of available studies, the FDA concluded in a July 2024 report that “current scientific evidence does not demonstrate that the levels of microplastics … detected in foods pose a risk to human health.”

The agency was critical of many published microplastics studies as having “used methods of variable, questionable, and/or limited accuracy and specificity,” but it said it will continue to monitor emerging research on the effects of microplastics and take regulatory action if necessary.

“Just like the science on the effects of BPA took many years to develop, the science on the effect of microplastics will too,” says Rhoades. “Once we have a clearer understanding of the potential toxicity, the ball will move one way or the other.”

To read more from Litigation Forecast 2025: What Corporate Counsel Need to Know for the Coming Year, visit here.

Insights

Publication | 01.15.25

Administrative Law: Big Shifts in Administrative Law

As companies consider taking class actions to trial, a blockbuster decision from the U.S. Supreme Court instructing lower courts not to defer to federal agencies’ interpretations of the statutes Congress charged them with administering may prove useful. Companies should also be aware of a second decision holding agencies’ use of in-house judges to mete out civil penalties to be unconstitutional....