MoCRA Under the Trump Era: A Look at FDA's Monitoring and Enforcement Two Months In
Client Alert | 3 min read | 03.27.25
Despite other sweeping changes to the federal government under the Trump administration, the Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act of 2022 (MoCRA), passed under former President Biden, remains good law. Below, we report on recent trends in FDA’s implementation and enforcement of MoCRA in the early months of Trump’s presidency.
FDA is continuing to monitor the cosmetic industry’s compliance with MoCRA. On March 13, 2025, FDA released data summarizing the number of active facility registrations and product listings submitted pursuant to MoCRA’s requirements.
As we have previously reported, MoCRA requires the “responsible person” (i.e., the manufacturer, packer, or distributor of a cosmetic product whose name appears on the label) to register their facilities with FDA and to update that registration every two years. The “responsible person” is also required to submit a list of each marketed cosmetic product, including the product’s ingredients, to FDA, with annual updates.
The new data shows that as of January 1, 2025, FDA has received 9,528 active facility registrations and 589,762 unique product listings, through either Cosmetics Direct, the Electronic Submission Gateway, Structure Product Labeling software, or paper submissions. Before MoCRA, FDA received voluntary cosmetic product filings and establishment registrations through the Voluntary Cosmetic Registration Program (VCRP). Under the VCRP, which ran from 1972 until it was sunset on March 27, 2023, the number of active establishment registrations was only 5,176, and the number of active product listings was only 35,102.
Notably, the number of facility registrations submitted pursuant to MoCRA’s mandate is almost twice the number of registrations voluntarily submitted through the VCRP. And the number of active MoCRA product listings is more than sixteen times the number of VCRP product filings, suggesting that the largest cosmetics facilities may not have been participating in the VCRP. This large increase in facility registrations and product listings also indicates the effect of a mandatory program when compared to a program that relies on voluntary participation.
As part of this same report, FDA also published information on the number of registered facilities in each U.S. state and territory as well as the number of foreign registered facilities in each country as of January 1, 2025. The total number of registered facilities in the U.S. is 1,800, with the highest number of registered facilities in California (373), Florida (201), New Jersey (144), Texas (120), and New York (118). Accordingly, these states likely are, and may continue to be, focal points for consumer litigation related to cosmetics. The foreign countries with the highest number of registered facilities are China (4,260), South Korea (617), India (309), Italy (273), and France (245). With more than double the number of domestic registered facilities, this report indicates that China has a dominant role in the U.S. cosmetics market.
In addition, during the first two months of the Trump administration, FDA’s enforcement of MoCRA followed a similar pattern as the prior administration. During this time, FDA again warned drug manufacturers of potential MoCRA violations, issuing warning letters to three entities. Specifically, FDA warned each drug manufacturer that some of the products they manufacture may be regulated as cosmetics and that, as a result, their facilities may be subject to requirements under MoCRA.
While uncertainty remains regarding how the Trump regulatory agenda and priorities may impact further implementation and enforcement of MoCRA, the recent data report and warning letters indicate that, at least for the time being, FDA is continuing to monitor for compliance with MoCRA in a manner consistent with its efforts during the Biden administration. Importantly, MoCRA’s provisions remain in full force and effect, and thus far, the Trump administration has not taken steps to alter these requirements. We will continue to analyze and report on MoCRA developments going forward.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 03.25.26
NAIC Intensifies AI Regulatory Focus: What Health Insurance Payors Need to Know
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) is intensifying its oversight of how insurers use AI — and the pace of regulatory activity shows no signs of slowing. Over the past several months, the NAIC has published a formal Issue Brief staking out its position on federal AI legislation, launched a multistate AI Evaluation Tool pilot aimed at examining insurers’ AI governance programs, and continued to expand adoption of its AI Model Bulletin across state lines. These developments continue a trend towards enhancing regulation; the NAIC adopted AI Principles in 2020 and a Model Bulletin in 2023 clarifying that existing insurance laws apply to AI systems and establishing expectations for governance, documentation, testing, and third-party oversight. That Model Bulletin has now been adopted in approximately 24 states.
Client Alert | 11 min read | 03.25.26
White House National AI Policy Framework Calls for Preempting State Laws, Protecting Children
Client Alert | 3 min read | 03.24.26
California Considering A Massive Expansion of Its Antitrust Laws
Client Alert | 2 min read | 03.23.26



