S. Starling Marshall
Areas of Focus
Overview
When clients face complex commercial and tax disputes, they rely on S. Starling Marshall as their advocate and counselor. Starling is a trial lawyer with over 15 years of experience who has successfully represented clients before federal and state courts, arbitration panels, and administrative tribunals. Drawing on her years of government service and private practice, she guides clients toward business-minded solutions throughout all phases of an investigation or litigation.
Career & Education
- Department of Justice: Tax Division
Court of Federal Claims Section, Trial Attorney, 2009–2016 - U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Law Clerk, Honorable Victor Marrero, 2008–2009
- Department of Justice: Tax Division
- Emory University, B.A., 2002
- Fordham University School of Law, J.D., cum laude, 2005
- New York
- U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
- U.S. Court of Federal Claims
Professional Activities and Memberships
- J. Edgar Murdock Inn of Court, 2013–Present
- Dave Nee Foundation, President of the Board of Directors, 2013–Present
- Fordham Law Alumni Association of Washington, President of the Board of Directors, 2012–2016
- Federal Bar Association – New York Chapter, 2016–Present; Taxation Steering Committee, 2012–Present
- American University's Washington College of Law, Adjunct Professor, 2012–2016
S. Starling's Insights
Client Alert | 35 min read | 07.11.24
On Friday, June 28, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council (“Chevron”)[1] in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (No. 22-451) and Relentless v. Dep’t of Commerce (No. 22–1219)[2] (the two cases collectively referred to as “Loper Bright”), bringing an official end to the decades-old and eponymously named “Chevron deference” doctrine. Not content to stop there, the Court returned fresh to work Monday, July 1, to, in Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (No. 22-451)[3] (“Corner Post”), effectively extend the limitations period to challenge final agency actions under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”).
Event | 06.27.24
Firm News | 9 min read | 06.06.24
Event | 05.23.24
International Tax Series: International Tax Controversy Update
Recognition
- The National Law Journal: Tax Law Trailblazer, 2023
- Crain’s New York Business: Notable Woman in Law, 2023
- The Best Lawyers in America: Lawyer of the Year, New York, 2022
- The Federal Bar Association: Section of Taxation Chair, 2021-2022
- American College of Tax Counsel: Fellow
S. Starling's Insights
Client Alert | 35 min read | 07.11.24
On Friday, June 28, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council (“Chevron”)[1] in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (No. 22-451) and Relentless v. Dep’t of Commerce (No. 22–1219)[2] (the two cases collectively referred to as “Loper Bright”), bringing an official end to the decades-old and eponymously named “Chevron deference” doctrine. Not content to stop there, the Court returned fresh to work Monday, July 1, to, in Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (No. 22-451)[3] (“Corner Post”), effectively extend the limitations period to challenge final agency actions under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”).
Event | 06.27.24
Firm News | 9 min read | 06.06.24
Event | 05.23.24
International Tax Series: International Tax Controversy Update
S. Starling's Insights
Client Alert | 35 min read | 07.11.24
On Friday, June 28, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council (“Chevron”)[1] in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (No. 22-451) and Relentless v. Dep’t of Commerce (No. 22–1219)[2] (the two cases collectively referred to as “Loper Bright”), bringing an official end to the decades-old and eponymously named “Chevron deference” doctrine. Not content to stop there, the Court returned fresh to work Monday, July 1, to, in Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (No. 22-451)[3] (“Corner Post”), effectively extend the limitations period to challenge final agency actions under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”).
Event | 06.27.24
Firm News | 9 min read | 06.06.24
Event | 05.23.24
International Tax Series: International Tax Controversy Update