Helena Alvarez
Overview
Helena Alvarez helps clients meet their legal and business objectives by counseling them on Antitrust & Competition and Mass Tort, Product & Consumer Litigation matters.
Career & Education
- American University Washington College of Law, J.D., cum laude, 2023
- Georgetown University, B.S., Foreign Service, 2016
- District of Columbia
- Member, ABA Antitrust Law Section, 2024 – Present
- Member, ABA Tort Trial and Insurance Practice Section, 2024 – Present
- Member, ABA Young Lawyers Division, 2024 – Present
- Board Member and Fundraising Chair, Central American Resource Center (CARECEN), 2022 – Present
- English
- Spanish (native)
- French
Helena's Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 07.20.26
On July 6, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published an Interim Final Rule (IFR) setting up a new federal framework that allows state, local, Tribal, and territorial (SLTT) law enforcement and correctional agencies to detect, track, and, in some cases, disable or seize drones. The rule directly affects SLTT agencies looking to stand up counter-drone programs, as well as drone and counter-drone technology companies whose products will be subject to federal review and approval. Although the IFR bypassed the Administrative Procedure Act’s standard notice-and-comment process on good cause grounds — citing the statutory 180-day deadline and urgent public safety needs — the rule is already legally binding and effective as of July 1, 2026. The Departments are nonetheless accepting post-promulgation comments through September 4, 2026.
Client Alert | 5 min read | 05.18.26
The Hidden Ingredient Problem: PFAS Litigation and Regulation Are Reshaping the Beauty Industry
Client Alert | 4 min read | 05.14.26
No-Fly Zones for Drones: FAA Proposes New Rules Over Critical Infrastructure
Publication | 04.27.26
Insights
Cosmetics Under the Microscope: FDA’s Expanding Regulatory Reach Under MoCRA
|04.08.26
Crowell & Moring’s Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer
- |
09.08.25
Crowell & Moring’s Transportation Law: Moving Forward
- |
08.28.25
Crowell & Moring’s Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer
- |
06.20.25
Crowell & Moring’s Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer
MoCRA Under the Trump Era: A Look at FDA’s Monitoring and Enforcement Two Months In
|03.27.25
Crowell & Moring’s State AG Blog
CPSC Announces New Staff Appointments
|03.14.25
Crowell & Moring’s Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer
What’s In and What’s Out? Cosmetic Companies Face Ingredient Compliance Conundrum
|01.17.24
Crowell & Moring’s Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer
CPSC Publishes Report on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
|06.03.21
Crowell & Moring’s Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer
Helena's Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 07.20.26
On July 6, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published an Interim Final Rule (IFR) setting up a new federal framework that allows state, local, Tribal, and territorial (SLTT) law enforcement and correctional agencies to detect, track, and, in some cases, disable or seize drones. The rule directly affects SLTT agencies looking to stand up counter-drone programs, as well as drone and counter-drone technology companies whose products will be subject to federal review and approval. Although the IFR bypassed the Administrative Procedure Act’s standard notice-and-comment process on good cause grounds — citing the statutory 180-day deadline and urgent public safety needs — the rule is already legally binding and effective as of July 1, 2026. The Departments are nonetheless accepting post-promulgation comments through September 4, 2026.
Client Alert | 5 min read | 05.18.26
The Hidden Ingredient Problem: PFAS Litigation and Regulation Are Reshaping the Beauty Industry
Client Alert | 4 min read | 05.14.26
No-Fly Zones for Drones: FAA Proposes New Rules Over Critical Infrastructure
Publication | 04.27.26




