Christopher D. Garcia
Overview
Government contractors—particularly those in the technology space—turn to Chris for advice when doing business with public sector customers at the federal, state, and local levels. Leveraging a series of secondments to cloud and online marketplace providers, Chris is uniquely situated to help companies pursue, negotiate, and perform government contracts while appreciating sensitive business concerns and reputational risks.
Career & Education
- University of California, Santa Barbara, B.A., With Honors, political science, 2012
- Loyola Law School, Los Angeles, J.D., cum laude, Order of the Coif, 2016
- California
- District of Columbia
- Spanish
Christopher's Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 01.17.25
In Bitmanagement Software GMBH v. United States, Case No. 23-1506 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 7, 2025), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) denied the appeal of Bitmanagement Software Gmbh (Bitmanagement) challenging the Court of Federal Claims’ (COFC) $154,400 damages award, and denying its demand for $85 million in damages resulting from the Navy’s infringement of Bitmanagement’s software copyright. The Federal Circuit affirmed the COFC’s (1) use of a hypothetical negotiation approach to compute damages; and (2) decision to award damages using a “per use” rather than a “per copy” approach.
Insights
No Reasonable Suspicion Required for Forensic Searches of Electronic Devices at the Border
|05.25.18
Crowell & Moring's International Trade Law
Christopher's Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 01.17.25
In Bitmanagement Software GMBH v. United States, Case No. 23-1506 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 7, 2025), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) denied the appeal of Bitmanagement Software Gmbh (Bitmanagement) challenging the Court of Federal Claims’ (COFC) $154,400 damages award, and denying its demand for $85 million in damages resulting from the Navy’s infringement of Bitmanagement’s software copyright. The Federal Circuit affirmed the COFC’s (1) use of a hypothetical negotiation approach to compute damages; and (2) decision to award damages using a “per use” rather than a “per copy” approach.