Jillian Ambrose

Counsel | She/Her/Hers

Overview

Jillian provides pragmatic advice and strategic support to employers navigating challenges big and small. Whether supporting clients in grappling with emerging issues like the evolving DEI landscape, investigating high-profile harassment allegations, or defending complex claims in federal court, Jillian brings a collaborate and practical approach to challenging situations.

Jillian is a trusted advisor to clients on all aspects of employment law, including compliance with state and federal anti-discrimination laws, leave issues, wage and hour law compliance, and accommodation requests. She creates and conducts engaging and impactful anti-harassment trainings and supports Human Resources and Employee Relations professionals in developing robust internal investigations practices. She brings a holistic approach to misconduct investigations, recognizing the importance of precision, as well as compassion, in addressing sensitive allegations and developing actionable recommendations. Jillian also guides clients through pay equity analyses and audits, and she counsels on the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning in making employment decisions.  

Jillian has a proven track record, in state and federal courts, of winning dismissal of claims of race, sex, disability, and age discrimination; wrongful termination; and wage and hour violations. 

Prior to joining the firm, Jillian served as a law clerk to Judge Anthony Epstein and then to Judge Steven M. Wellner, both of the D.C. Superior Court. Before law school, Jillian was an analyst in the human capital practice of an international consulting firm, where she provided management consulting services to a portfolio of federal agency clients.

Jillian graduated from the University of Michigan Law School, where she was the administrative manager of the Michigan Journal of Gender and Law and the president of the Women Law Students Association. She holds a bachelor's degree in government from Smith College.

Career & Education

|
    • Smith College, B.A., cum laude, government, 2007
    • University of Michigan Law School, J.D., cum laude, 2013
    • Smith College, B.A., cum laude, government, 2007
    • University of Michigan Law School, J.D., cum laude, 2013
    • District of Columbia
    • Maryland
    • U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
    • District of Columbia
    • Maryland
    • U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

Jillian's Insights

Client Alert | 2 min read | 09.23.24

Artificial Intelligence in Employment Update: Illinois Requires Notice and Prohibits Discriminatory Impact in Use of AI

Effective January 1, 2026, H.B. 3773 amends Article 5, Section 2 of the Illinois Human Rights Act to explicitly prohibit employers from using artificial intelligence (“AI”) for a broad swath of employment decisions, including recruitment, hiring, promotion, renewal of employment, selection for training or apprenticeship, discharge, discipline, tenure, or the terms, privileges, or conditions of employment, if such use has the effect of subjecting employees to discrimination on the basis of a protected class.  The amendment also prohibits employers from using zip code as a proxy for protected classes.  H.B. 3773 further provides that employers will be required to provide notice to employees prior to using AI for such employment-related purposes.  The law applies to any employers employing one or more employees within Illinois during 20 or more calendar weeks during the calendar year. ...

|

Jillian's Insights

Client Alert | 2 min read | 09.23.24

Artificial Intelligence in Employment Update: Illinois Requires Notice and Prohibits Discriminatory Impact in Use of AI

Effective January 1, 2026, H.B. 3773 amends Article 5, Section 2 of the Illinois Human Rights Act to explicitly prohibit employers from using artificial intelligence (“AI”) for a broad swath of employment decisions, including recruitment, hiring, promotion, renewal of employment, selection for training or apprenticeship, discharge, discipline, tenure, or the terms, privileges, or conditions of employment, if such use has the effect of subjecting employees to discrimination on the basis of a protected class.  The amendment also prohibits employers from using zip code as a proxy for protected classes.  H.B. 3773 further provides that employers will be required to provide notice to employees prior to using AI for such employment-related purposes.  The law applies to any employers employing one or more employees within Illinois during 20 or more calendar weeks during the calendar year. ...