Amna Arshad

Partner

Overview

A former federal regulator at the US Department of Transportation for six years, Amna has deep knowledge and expertise in aviation regulations, having drafted regulations, and led investigations, audits, and enforcement actions. Her government insights and relationships combined with her several years of experience at top US Am Law 100 firms advising on the full range of aviation and transportation regulatory issues for all types of global transportation clients – from major US and non-US passenger and cargo airlines, to transportation start-ups, as well as Fortune 200 companies – provide her a unique ability to counsel her clients through their most pressing regulatory challenges. Amna is a client-focused, trusted leader who works with her clients to craft business-focused legal strategies, manage risk, and resolve complex issues with practical solutions.

Amna’s practice spans across a wide range of aviation regulatory matters including but not limited to: enforcement and litigation defense, investigations, antitrust/competition, joint ventures and alliances, airports/slots, route proceedings, rulemakings, international law, consumer protection, economic/licensing matters as well as regulatory due diligence on mergers and acquisitions involving aviation interests. Amna also has experience advising companies that are investing in and creating new aviation technologies, including UAS and eVTOLs, on emerging regulatory issues and trends. Amna counsels clients on matters before all federal agencies that regulate the aviation sector including the US DOT, FAA, NTSB, DOJ, and DHS (CBP/TSA).

Amna’s passion to advance diversity is a hallmark of her leadership. She is a member of the governing committee and chair of the diversity, equity, and inclusion committee for the ABA Air & Space Law Forum; the vice president of the International Aviation Club of Washington; and a member of the International Aviation Womens Association; a member of the Legal Advisory Committee of the Capital Area Immigrants’ Rights Coalition; and a member of The Columbian Women of The George Washington University.          

Amna is recognized as a thought leader and frequent author and speaker on a myriad of transportation and aviation legal topics. Recognized as “Aviation Lawyer of the Year,” Washington Business Journal’s “40 Under 40,” Law360’s “Transportation Rising Star,” and Chambers-ranked.

Career & Education

|
    • U.S. Department of Transportation
      Senior Trial Attorney, Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings, Office of General Counsel, 2010–2016
    • U.S. Department of Transportation
      Senior Trial Attorney, Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings, Office of General Counsel, 2010–2016
    • Hague Court of Arbitration for Aviation, Hague Netherlands, Advisory Board Member, June 2022–Present
    • Hague Court of Arbitration for Aviation, Hague Netherlands, Advisory Board Member, June 2022–Present
    • American University Washington College of Law, J.D., cum laude , 2007
    • The George Washington University, The Elliott School of International Affairs, B.A., International Affairs and Middle Eastern Studies, magna cum laude , 2004
    • American University Washington College of Law, J.D., cum laude , 2007
    • The George Washington University, The Elliott School of International Affairs, B.A., International Affairs and Middle Eastern Studies, magna cum laude , 2004
    • District of Columbia, 2009
    • Virginia, 2007
    • District of Columbia, 2009
    • Virginia, 2007
    • Fairfax County Circuit Court, 2008
    • Fairfax County Circuit Court, 2007
    • Fairfax County Circuit Court, 2008
    • Fairfax County Circuit Court, 2007
    • President, International Aviation Club, 2024–Present
    • Diversity Committee Chair, Governing Committee, ABA Air & Space Law Forum, 2023Present
    • Law360 Transportation Editorial Advisory Board Member, 2016–Present
    • Vice President, International Aviation Club, 2018–2023
    • Legal Advisory Board Member, Capital Area Immigrants’ Rights Coalition, 2016–Present
    • Board Member, GWU Columbian Women Scholarship Program, 2019–Present
    • Member, International Aviation Womens Association, 2016–Present
    • Air & Space Law Committee Co–Chair, ABA Young Lawyers Division, 2016–2017
    • President, International Aviation Club, 2024–Present
    • Diversity Committee Chair, Governing Committee, ABA Air & Space Law Forum, 2023Present
    • Law360 Transportation Editorial Advisory Board Member, 2016–Present
    • Vice President, International Aviation Club, 2018–2023
    • Legal Advisory Board Member, Capital Area Immigrants’ Rights Coalition, 2016–Present
    • Board Member, GWU Columbian Women Scholarship Program, 2019–Present
    • Member, International Aviation Womens Association, 2016–Present
    • Air & Space Law Committee Co–Chair, ABA Young Lawyers Division, 2016–2017
    • English
    • Urdu
    • Punjabi
    • Arabic
    • Spanish
    • English
    • Urdu
    • Punjabi
    • Arabic
    • Spanish
She has incredible relationships, is very well respected and brings strong insights.

Chambers USA, 2023

Amna's Insights

Client Alert | 35 min read | 07.11.24

The Supreme Court’s Double Hammer to Agencies: Loper Bright and Corner Post Set New Precedents for Challenging Federal Agency Action

On Friday, June 28, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council (“Chevron”)[1] in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (No. 22-451) and Relentless v. Dep’t of Commerce (No. 22–1219)[2] (the two cases collectively referred to as “Loper Bright”), bringing an official end to the decades-old and eponymously named “Chevron deference” doctrine. Not content to stop there, the Court returned fresh to work Monday, July 1, to, in Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (No. 22-451)[3] (“Corner Post”), effectively extend the limitations period to challenge final agency actions under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”)....

Representative Matters

  • Advise US passenger and cargo airlines on the full range of aviation and transportation regulatory issues, including FAA and DOT certification, economic fitness, routes, international alliances and cooperative agreements, antitrust and competition, mergers, consumer issues, disability compliance as well as FAA, NTSB, CBP matters.
  • Advised a US airline on compliance with government regulations related to a proposed commercial multi-modal transportation program at an airport.
  • Advised OEM and aviation clients in DOT and FAA regulatory actions, as well as in US federal litigation stemming from regulatory violations.
  • Advised financial institution in regulatory due diligence involving a transaction to acquire airport concessions/leases.
  • Advised a technology company in its acquisition of a developer of autonomous/self-driving technology which included due diligence review to ensure compliance with US federal and state regulations related to autonomous driving.
  • Advised a major technology company on development of unmanned aircraft systems using drone technology as well as other transportation related compliance issues.
  • Represented an aviation client on its successful acquisition of airport slots at a highly restricted airport following a hotly contested US DOT route allocation proceeding and other regulatory proceedings, including service to Cuba.
  • Advised aviation clients on compliance with international regulatory standards for foreign operations, including EASA, ICAO and other foreign domestic civil aviation authorities.
  • Advised multiple aviation clients on relevant laws and regulatory frameworks for experimental or commercial operations and testing in domestic and international jurisdictions, including for unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) operations.

Amna's Insights

Client Alert | 35 min read | 07.11.24

The Supreme Court’s Double Hammer to Agencies: Loper Bright and Corner Post Set New Precedents for Challenging Federal Agency Action

On Friday, June 28, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council (“Chevron”)[1] in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (No. 22-451) and Relentless v. Dep’t of Commerce (No. 22–1219)[2] (the two cases collectively referred to as “Loper Bright”), bringing an official end to the decades-old and eponymously named “Chevron deference” doctrine. Not content to stop there, the Court returned fresh to work Monday, July 1, to, in Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (No. 22-451)[3] (“Corner Post”), effectively extend the limitations period to challenge final agency actions under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”)....

Recognition

  • National Asian Pacific Bar Association, Prospective Partners Program, 2023
  • Aviation Lawyer of the Year (shortlisted), Women in Business Law, 2023
  • Chambers USA Ranking, Band 3 – Nationwide: Aviation Regulatory, 2021–2024
  • Law360 Transportation Editorial Board Appointment, 2016–2023
  • Euromoney’s 2022 Rising Star in Aviation, 2022
  • National Asian Pacific Bar Association, Leadership Achievement Program Fellow, 2022
  • Aviation Regulatory – "Firms to Watch" – Ranking in The Legal 500, 2022
  • Washington Business Journal, “40 Under 40” Award, 2021
  • Law360 Transportation Rising Star Award, 2018

Amna's Insights

Client Alert | 35 min read | 07.11.24

The Supreme Court’s Double Hammer to Agencies: Loper Bright and Corner Post Set New Precedents for Challenging Federal Agency Action

On Friday, June 28, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council (“Chevron”)[1] in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (No. 22-451) and Relentless v. Dep’t of Commerce (No. 22–1219)[2] (the two cases collectively referred to as “Loper Bright”), bringing an official end to the decades-old and eponymously named “Chevron deference” doctrine. Not content to stop there, the Court returned fresh to work Monday, July 1, to, in Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (No. 22-451)[3] (“Corner Post”), effectively extend the limitations period to challenge final agency actions under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”)....

|

Amna's Insights

Client Alert | 35 min read | 07.11.24

The Supreme Court’s Double Hammer to Agencies: Loper Bright and Corner Post Set New Precedents for Challenging Federal Agency Action

On Friday, June 28, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council (“Chevron”)[1] in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (No. 22-451) and Relentless v. Dep’t of Commerce (No. 22–1219)[2] (the two cases collectively referred to as “Loper Bright”), bringing an official end to the decades-old and eponymously named “Chevron deference” doctrine. Not content to stop there, the Court returned fresh to work Monday, July 1, to, in Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (No. 22-451)[3] (“Corner Post”), effectively extend the limitations period to challenge final agency actions under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”)....