Kent B. Goss
Overview
A first chair trial lawyer with over 30 years of experience, Kent Goss focuses his practice on intellectual property matters, technology litigation, and large complex commercial litigation matters. Clients come to Kent for their most important matters – “bet the company” disputes and where the stakes can be in the hundreds of millions of dollars. With a deep understanding of the legal and business aspects of intellectual property law, Kent is committed to providing comprehensive and effective legal solutions to a wide range of clients.
Career & Education
- Occidental College, B.A., cum laude, economics, 1983
- University of California, Hastings College of the Law, J.D., 1987
- California
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
- U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
- U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
- U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Memberships
- State Bar of California
- American Bar Association
- United States Trademark Association
… Goss is thorough with his case analysis and provides practical recommendations.
— Chambers, 2022
Kent's Insights
Press Coverage | 07.15.24
Firm News | 9 min read | 06.06.24
Firm News | 2 min read | 02.09.24
World Trademark Review Ranks Crowell & Moring in WTR 1000 2024 Guide
Firm News | 9 min read | 06.01.23
Representative Matters
- A car audio manufacturer in a patent infringement case.
- A start-up in an action against a social media company related to the client’s suspension from the platform based upon the client’s use of unique technology on the platform. On the eve of trial, the matter settled favorably for the client.
- A major sports league in a trademark infringement action in the District of Columbia. The matter settled favorably for the client.
- A major beverage maker in an action for trademark infringement. After a multi-week jury trial, the Plaintiff received a fraction of the amount requested.
- The corporate owner of an elite boat racing team in an arbitration who was facing claims for fraud, concealment and breach of contract. The arbitrator found in our client’s favor on liability and the client was awarded attorneys’ fees.
- A major television distributor as the plaintiff in an arbitration against a leading global media and entertainment company. At issue in the arbitration was his client’s indemnity rights under an Affiliation Agreement. The arbitrator found in favor of our client on the issue of liability. Our client recovered damages in the eight figures.
- A major aerospace company in an ongoing trade secrets case against a former supplier of avionics systems for aircraft. The Plaintiffs seek in excess of $100 million.
- A major aviation finance company in multiple jurisdictions against a private jet charter company in cases relating to the sale of a fleet of aircraft. After having his client dismissed from the case, the matter settled favorably.
- The owner of the largest library of still and interactive automotive images in a copyright infringement action against a global media company. The global media company faces damages in excess of $100 million for infringement.
- A major aircraft engine manufacturer in a trademark infringement case against its former supplier where the ability to obtain a trademark for a model designation is at issue.
- A former executive at an investment advisory firm in a trade secrets case against his former employer in multiple jurisdictions. We obtained the reversal of a preliminary injunction in a published opinion. The matter was settled favorably for the client.
- A major television services company in a multiweek jury trial against a leading global media and entertainment company. The media company was seeking in excess of $100 million in damages. After the first week of trial, the case was resolved favorably for the client.
- A leading ad placement and search engine optimization company in a five-week jury trial in the Central District of California. After winning summary judgment on the copyright, trade dress, and counterfeit claims, we successfully convinced a jury that the client's use of a competitor's trademark in keyword advertising was not trademark infringement, staving off a demand for damages in excess of $20 million.
- A leading Japanese manufacturer and distributor of golf and outdoor products in a four-week jury trial in the Northern District of Texas where the plaintiff was seeking in excess of $30 million. We obtained a complete defense verdict on claims for unfair business practices and breach of contract, and the client was awarded monetary damages on its counterclaim.
- A local land developer as plaintiff against a Fortune 500 conglomerate in a two-week bench trial in which our client was awarded a multimillion-dollar piece of land in an action for specific performance. After establishing all elements of fraud against the defendant, the matter settled prior to jury selection.
- A group of shareholders of an environmental start-up company as plaintiff in a multiweek arbitration. After weeks of testimony, the defendants adjourned the arbitration in order to discuss settlement which resulted in an eight-figure settlement and a license to the defendants' technology.
- A leading Japanese electronics manufacturer as plaintiff in a trademark infringement case in arbitration. After several days of testimony, the defendant adjourned the arbitration to discuss settlement which resulted in a substantial settlement, including payment of the client's attorneys' fees.
- National Football League quarterback Tom Brady for violations of his right of publicity resulting in multiple settlements before an answer was filed.
- A television actress in defending claims for defamation which resulted in a judgment in her favor.
- A "founding father" of Mixed Martial Arts (MMA), Royce Gracie, in a dispute between fight promoters.
- A heavyweight title contender in Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) in an action against his manager and promoter.
- A prominent group of local real estate developers and franchisees in an action against a publicly traded REIT for breach of contract, specific performance, fraud, and interference with contract. On the eve of trial, the matter was settled favorably for the clients.
Kent's Insights
Press Coverage | 07.15.24
Firm News | 9 min read | 06.06.24
Firm News | 2 min read | 02.09.24
World Trademark Review Ranks Crowell & Moring in WTR 1000 2024 Guide
Firm News | 9 min read | 06.01.23
Recognition
- Los Angeles Business Journal: Most Influential Intellectual Property Attorneys, 2017
- World Trademark Review 1000: Leading Trademark Professionals, 2013-2020
- Super Lawyers: 2004-2011, 2014-2016
- Letter of Commendation for Academic Excellence
- Occidental Forensic Union
Kent's Insights
Press Coverage | 07.15.24
Firm News | 9 min read | 06.06.24
Firm News | 2 min read | 02.09.24
World Trademark Review Ranks Crowell & Moring in WTR 1000 2024 Guide
Firm News | 9 min read | 06.01.23
Insights
Data, Data Everywhere – Positioning Your Company to Survive and Thrive in the Data Revolution
|01.09.18
Crowell & Moring's Litigation Forecast 2018
Crowell & Moring Continues California Recruitment Drive
|11.14.17
World Intellectual Property Review
The Most Influential Intellectual Property Attorneys In Los Angeles
|08.01.17
Los Angeles Business Journal
The Defend Trade Secrets Act and How it Differs from State Trade Secret Laws
|08.30.22
Crowell & Moring’s Trade Secrets Trends
Trade Secrets Not So Secret: Conventional Technique, New Application
|04.26.22
Crowell & Moring’s Trade Secrets Trends
Who’s on the Line?: Protecting Your Trade Secrets on Zoom Calls
|01.27.21
Crowell & Moring’s Trade Secrets Trends
Practices
Industries
Kent's Insights
Press Coverage | 07.15.24
Firm News | 9 min read | 06.06.24
Firm News | 2 min read | 02.09.24
World Trademark Review Ranks Crowell & Moring in WTR 1000 2024 Guide
Firm News | 9 min read | 06.01.23