Fan Cheng

Counsel

Overview

Fan Cheng focuses her practice on trademark prosecution and litigation, copyright law, domain name disputes, trade dress and design protection. She strives to bring a holistic, business-first approach when representing clients across industries—from consumer goods to pharmaceutical products.

Fan has developed extensive experience in trademark and design clearance and prosecution, portfolio management, and enforcement. She works closely with clients and counsel around the world to develop and maintain their trademark portfolios. Fan works with both domestic and international clients, providing an understanding of the commercial needs and concerns of global clients.

Fan’s litigation experience includes representing clients in civil litigation in federal district court and Section 337 proceedings before the International Trade Commission.

Fan also works for pro bono clients in collaboration with Lawyers for the Creative Arts and the International Trademark Association.

Career & Education

    • Global IP Law Group
      Summer Associate, May 2018–July 2018
    • Tesla
      Extern, January 2018–April 2018
    • American Medical Association
      Extern, August 2017–November 2017
    • Illinois Legal Aid Online
      Access to Justice Technology Fellow, May 2017–July 2017
    • Global IP Law Group
      Summer Associate, May 2018–July 2018
    • Tesla
      Extern, January 2018–April 2018
    • American Medical Association
      Extern, August 2017–November 2017
    • Illinois Legal Aid Online
      Access to Justice Technology Fellow, May 2017–July 2017
    • Renmin University of China, B.B.A., Business Administration, 2013
    • Renmin University of China, LL.B., Law, 2013
    • Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law, J.D., 2019
    • Renmin University of China, B.B.A., Business Administration, 2013
    • Renmin University of China, LL.B., Law, 2013
    • Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law, J.D., 2019
    • Illinois
    • Illinois
    • Mandarin
    • Mandarin

Fan's Insights

Client Alert | 2 min read | 04.17.25

Will the Supreme Court Address Whether the Ninth Circuit’s Server Test Comports With the Display Right Accorded Copyright Owners?

Will the Supreme Court review the Ninth Circuit’s unique Server Test for online copyright infringement? After the Ninth Circuit recently affirmed the Server Test, a photographer and copyright owner has requested certiorari. Petitioner-Plaintiff, Elliot McGucken, is a landscape photographer. Respondent-Defendant, Valnet, Inc., is the owner of a travel website located at “www.thetravel.com.” McGucken sued Valnet for copyright infringement when Valnet embedded on its site a number of links to McGucken’s Instagram posts. The district court, bound by the Ninth Circuit’s en banc decision in Perfect 10, granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss, finding that the Server Test foreclosed McGucken’s direct infringement claim as a matter of law, because Valnet linked to the images and did not store them on its own servers. The Ninth Circuit affirmed in a panel decision. McGucken now requests the Supreme Court to review the validity of the Server Test, which is unique to the Ninth Circuit....

Fan's Insights

Client Alert | 2 min read | 04.17.25

Will the Supreme Court Address Whether the Ninth Circuit’s Server Test Comports With the Display Right Accorded Copyright Owners?

Will the Supreme Court review the Ninth Circuit’s unique Server Test for online copyright infringement? After the Ninth Circuit recently affirmed the Server Test, a photographer and copyright owner has requested certiorari. Petitioner-Plaintiff, Elliot McGucken, is a landscape photographer. Respondent-Defendant, Valnet, Inc., is the owner of a travel website located at “www.thetravel.com.” McGucken sued Valnet for copyright infringement when Valnet embedded on its site a number of links to McGucken’s Instagram posts. The district court, bound by the Ninth Circuit’s en banc decision in Perfect 10, granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss, finding that the Server Test foreclosed McGucken’s direct infringement claim as a matter of law, because Valnet linked to the images and did not store them on its own servers. The Ninth Circuit affirmed in a panel decision. McGucken now requests the Supreme Court to review the validity of the Server Test, which is unique to the Ninth Circuit....