Morgan Lily Phoenix
Overview
Morgan Phoenix focuses her practice on product liability, mass torts, and consumer litigation, as well as advising a range of clients on maintaining product compliance with various government agencies. Morgan also advises clients working with government agencies to focus on product safety in a complex regulatory schema. She has experience in bankruptcy, unfair practice, and environmental civil litigation, as well as several class actions.
Career & Education
- English Teaching Assistantship, Fulbright Scholar Germany Grantee, 2017–2018
- The George Washington University Law School, J.D., 2022
George Washington Scholar, Class of 1971 Merit Scholarship, Dean’s Fellow - Denison University, B.A., magna cum laude, Psychology; German Minor
- The George Washington University Law School, J.D., 2022
- District of Columbia
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals
- English
- German
Morgan's Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 04.03.25
Those familiar with the supplier and buyer contracting realm will have likely heard of a “requirements contract” or a “blanket purchase order” which essentially allows parties to mutually guarantee that they will buy and sell to each other for a specific period of time, but lets the parties figure out the exact amount of a product later, often on an order-by-order basis. This approach is often favored for its reliability in knowing your supply needs are met (or you have a reliable buyer), while letting the supply move up or down based on real and variable demand. These arrangements are particularly prevalent in supply agreements in the automobile industry.
Representative Matters
- Counsel for an oil exploration company in environmental and civil litigation arising from an oil spill.
- Counsel to an energy client in multiple individual and class actions challenging royalty payments pursuant to oil and gas leases in West Virginia.
- Counsel to a multinational conglomerate corporation in a complex bankruptcy trial.
- Counsel to a large social media company in successful defense of unfair business practices under California law.
Morgan's Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 04.03.25
Those familiar with the supplier and buyer contracting realm will have likely heard of a “requirements contract” or a “blanket purchase order” which essentially allows parties to mutually guarantee that they will buy and sell to each other for a specific period of time, but lets the parties figure out the exact amount of a product later, often on an order-by-order basis. This approach is often favored for its reliability in knowing your supply needs are met (or you have a reliable buyer), while letting the supply move up or down based on real and variable demand. These arrangements are particularly prevalent in supply agreements in the automobile industry.
Recognition
- ALM Litigator of the Week Runner-Up, Litigation Daily, September 2023 (Litigation involved work alongside National Immigrant Justice Center representing nearly 20,000 Afghan asylum seekers.)
- High Honors on the Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll, Superior Court of the District of Columbia and the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2023
Morgan's Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 04.03.25
Those familiar with the supplier and buyer contracting realm will have likely heard of a “requirements contract” or a “blanket purchase order” which essentially allows parties to mutually guarantee that they will buy and sell to each other for a specific period of time, but lets the parties figure out the exact amount of a product later, often on an order-by-order basis. This approach is often favored for its reliability in knowing your supply needs are met (or you have a reliable buyer), while letting the supply move up or down based on real and variable demand. These arrangements are particularly prevalent in supply agreements in the automobile industry.
Morgan's Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 04.03.25
Those familiar with the supplier and buyer contracting realm will have likely heard of a “requirements contract” or a “blanket purchase order” which essentially allows parties to mutually guarantee that they will buy and sell to each other for a specific period of time, but lets the parties figure out the exact amount of a product later, often on an order-by-order basis. This approach is often favored for its reliability in knowing your supply needs are met (or you have a reliable buyer), while letting the supply move up or down based on real and variable demand. These arrangements are particularly prevalent in supply agreements in the automobile industry.
