Lisa KimmelPh.D.
Overview
Lisa Kimmel is a senior counsel in Crowell & Moring's Antitrust and Competition Group. She resides in the firm's Washington, D.C. office. Lisa's practice covers merger and civil nonmerger antitrust investigations and antitrust counseling. Lisa also advocates for clients on competition policy matters before federal and state antitrust agencies, focusing in particular on the technology and digital commerce sectors.
Career & Education
- Federal Trade Commission
Attorney Advisor on Antitrust and Competition Policy, Office of the Chairwoman, 2010–2015
- Federal Trade Commission
- University of California, Los Angeles, B.A., magna cum laude, economics
- University of California, Berkeley, Ph.D., economics
- University of California, Berkeley School of Law, J.D.
- California
- District of Columbia
Lisa's Insights
Client Alert | 35 min read | 07.11.24
On Friday, June 28, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council (“Chevron”)[1] in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (No. 22-451) and Relentless v. Dep’t of Commerce (No. 22–1219)[2] (the two cases collectively referred to as “Loper Bright”), bringing an official end to the decades-old and eponymously named “Chevron deference” doctrine. Not content to stop there, the Court returned fresh to work Monday, July 1, to, in Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (No. 22-451)[3] (“Corner Post”), effectively extend the limitations period to challenge final agency actions under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”).
Speaking Engagement | 06.27.22
Insights
The Patent Market Power Fallacy: Recalibrating Market Power and Standard-Essential Patents
|02.26.21
The Licensing Journal, Vol. 41, No. 2.
Chapter 13: Antitrust and Intellectual Property Licensing
|04.01.20
Wolters Kluwer Licensing Update 2020
Antitrust in the Digital Age
|02.26.20
Crowell & Moring's Regulatory Forecast 2020
DOJ Official Says FRAND Licensing Disputes Could Raise Competition Concerns
|09.30.21
Global Competition Review
- |
06.18.21
National Law Journal
Delrahim Voices Support For Antitrust Reforms To Confront “Tech Giants”
|01.21.21
Global Competition Review USA
Lisa's Insights
Client Alert | 35 min read | 07.11.24
On Friday, June 28, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council (“Chevron”)[1] in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (No. 22-451) and Relentless v. Dep’t of Commerce (No. 22–1219)[2] (the two cases collectively referred to as “Loper Bright”), bringing an official end to the decades-old and eponymously named “Chevron deference” doctrine. Not content to stop there, the Court returned fresh to work Monday, July 1, to, in Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (No. 22-451)[3] (“Corner Post”), effectively extend the limitations period to challenge final agency actions under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”).
Speaking Engagement | 06.27.22