Kelsey Clinton
Overview
Kelsey Clinton is an associate in the International Trade and White Collar and Regulatory Enforcement practices in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office. Kelsey’s practice focuses on a variety of matters, including analyzing global sanctions and export control regimes to provide compliance guidance, as well as representing clients in government and congressional investigations.
Career & Education
- U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Law Clerk, Honorable Eli J. Richardson, 2021–2022 - Department of Justice: United States Attorneys' Office
Intern, Major Crimes Division, 2019
- U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
- Vanderbilt University, B.A., magna cum laude
- Stanford Law School, J.D., 2021
- District of Columbia
- Tennessee (Inactive)
Kelsey's Insights
Client Alert | 7 min read | 11.08.24
New BIS Guidance Continues Trend of Enhanced EAR Compliance Expectations for Financial Institutions
The U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”) issued new guidance (“BIS Guidance”) for financial institutions (“FIs”) on October 9, 2024, recommending that FIs undertake specific compliance practices to minimize their risk of violating General Prohibition (“GP”) 10 of BIS’s Export Administration Regulations (“EAR”). GP 10 prohibits any person (U.S. or otherwise) from selling, transferring, exporting, reexporting, financing, ordering, buying, removing, concealing, storing, using, loaning, disposing of, transporting, forwarding, or otherwise servicing an item “subject to the EAR” with knowledge that that item was, or will be, exported, reexported, or transferred in violation of the EAR. Knowledge in this context goes beyond actual knowledge, and can be inferred from circumstances surrounding a transaction; in other words, a “known or should have known” standard. Although BIS has published several joint alerts with FinCEN encouraging financial institutions to look for potential red flags of evasion of export controls, this guidance goes further in establishing specific export compliance best practices for financial institutions and suggests that financial institutions that finance or otherwise service prohibited exports risk liability under the EAR.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 05.23.24
Publication | 05.01.24
Insights
- |
07.11.23
The Banking Law Journal
- |
06.15.23
Government Contracting Law Report
Commerce, Treasury, DOJ Publish Tri-Seal Sanctions and Export Control Compliance Note
|03.19.24
Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Law
BIS Publishes FAQs on Export Controls of Semiconductors and Advanced Computing Items
|01.03.24
Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Law
State Department Publishes Fact Sheet on AUKUS Trade Authorization Mechanism
|07.17.23
Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Law
- |
04.24.23
Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Law
Kelsey's Insights
Client Alert | 7 min read | 11.08.24
New BIS Guidance Continues Trend of Enhanced EAR Compliance Expectations for Financial Institutions
The U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”) issued new guidance (“BIS Guidance”) for financial institutions (“FIs”) on October 9, 2024, recommending that FIs undertake specific compliance practices to minimize their risk of violating General Prohibition (“GP”) 10 of BIS’s Export Administration Regulations (“EAR”). GP 10 prohibits any person (U.S. or otherwise) from selling, transferring, exporting, reexporting, financing, ordering, buying, removing, concealing, storing, using, loaning, disposing of, transporting, forwarding, or otherwise servicing an item “subject to the EAR” with knowledge that that item was, or will be, exported, reexported, or transferred in violation of the EAR. Knowledge in this context goes beyond actual knowledge, and can be inferred from circumstances surrounding a transaction; in other words, a “known or should have known” standard. Although BIS has published several joint alerts with FinCEN encouraging financial institutions to look for potential red flags of evasion of export controls, this guidance goes further in establishing specific export compliance best practices for financial institutions and suggests that financial institutions that finance or otherwise service prohibited exports risk liability under the EAR.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 05.23.24
Publication | 05.01.24