Glenn D. Grant
Overview
Glenn D. Grant is a senior counsel in the Crowell & Moring's Labor and Employment Group, where he counsels and represents employers on the full range of labor and employment law matters, including such areas as disability discrimination issues, wage and hour compliance, affirmative action compliance, employment policies, FMLA compliance, ERISA, and wrongful discharge/employment tort litigation.
Career & Education
- Bucknell University, B.A.
- The George Washington University Law School, J.D., With Honors, Member of George Washington Law Review
- District of Columbia
- Pennsylvania (Inactive)
Professional Activities and Memberships
- Member, Labor and Employment Sections, D.C. and American Bar Associations
Glenn's Insights
Client Alert | 7 min read | 08.16.24
Over the past several years, federal courts have increasingly questioned the authority of administrative law judges (ALJs) to adjudicate alleged violations of certain labor and employment statutes. In the last several weeks, two U.S. district courts in Texas issued decisions halting unfair labor practice proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) on the grounds that NLRB ALJs lack the constitutional authority to preside over such actions due to unconstitutional protections against their removal.[1] Similarly, the last year has seen several decisions by courts in the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits finding that ALJs, whose decisions are not reviewable by a Presidential appointee, lack constitutional authority under the Appointments Clause to adjudicate claims.[2] The trend illustrated by these decisions, combined with the Supreme Court’s decision in June to abandon the Chevron doctrine of extending deference to federal agency rule-making proceedings, portend significant changes in the way employers interact with federal agencies that enforce labor and employment law.
Client Alert | 5 min read | 06.24.24
Client Alert | 6 min read | 01.22.24
The Department of Labor Publishes the Final Independent Contractor Rule
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.07.23
Insights
Legalization of Marijuana: What It Means for Employer Drug Testing
|06.10.15
Employee Relations Law Journal
Arguments Over NBCWA Article I Reach Apogee
|06.10.03
Crowell & Moring Mining Law Monitor, Vol. 20, Issue 2
EEOC v. Waffle House: The EEOC's Enforcement Powers Trump Employers' Mandatory Arbitration Agreements
|01.01.02
Crowell & Moring Employment Law Briefing, Issue 19
"Third Thursday – Employees, Marijuana, and Other Drugs – How Can Employers Respond?" Crowell & Moring Webinar Series, 2023.
|06.22.23
- |
01.31.08
BNA's Daily Labor Report, No. 20, ISSN 1522-5968
Glenn's Insights
Client Alert | 7 min read | 08.16.24
Over the past several years, federal courts have increasingly questioned the authority of administrative law judges (ALJs) to adjudicate alleged violations of certain labor and employment statutes. In the last several weeks, two U.S. district courts in Texas issued decisions halting unfair labor practice proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) on the grounds that NLRB ALJs lack the constitutional authority to preside over such actions due to unconstitutional protections against their removal.[1] Similarly, the last year has seen several decisions by courts in the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits finding that ALJs, whose decisions are not reviewable by a Presidential appointee, lack constitutional authority under the Appointments Clause to adjudicate claims.[2] The trend illustrated by these decisions, combined with the Supreme Court’s decision in June to abandon the Chevron doctrine of extending deference to federal agency rule-making proceedings, portend significant changes in the way employers interact with federal agencies that enforce labor and employment law.
Client Alert | 5 min read | 06.24.24
Client Alert | 6 min read | 01.22.24
The Department of Labor Publishes the Final Independent Contractor Rule
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.07.23
