1. Home
  2. |Professionals
  3. |Anna Z. Saber

Anna Z. Saber

Counsel | She/Her/Hers
Counsel | She/Her/Hers
YXNhYmVyQGNyb3dlbGwuY29t
VCardLinkedIn
VCardLinkedIn

Areas of Focus

Overview

Anna Z. Saber is a counsel in the San Francisco office of Crowell & Moring, where she is a member of the Litigation Group.

Anna has experience representing clients in state and federal courts in technology-related litigation involving trade secret and trademark misappropriation, copyright infringement and DMCA, cybersecurity and digital crimes, and complex commercial matters. Anna also has experience representing clients in employment disputes.

Using the insights gained through her litigation practice, Anna also has a counseling practice in which she helps clients establish sound licensing agreements to meet their business goals. She provides counsel on matters related to technology transactions, IP protection, and drafting and negotiating commercial and intellectual property agreements for companies ranging from start-ups to market leaders.

Anna’s pro bono practice includes voting rights and wrongful conviction matters.

While at SCU Law, she competed in trial team and moot court, including a second-place finish at the Clara Barton International Humanitarian Law Moot Court Competition. Anna was also a member of the Santa Clara Law Review board, where she served as senior managing editor. A Bay Area native, she enjoys giving back to her local community. Most recently, she has been a co-coach for a high school mock trial team competing in the Santa Clara County High School Mock Trial Program.

Career & Education

    • University of California, Santa Barbara, B.A., Phi Sigma Alpha, 2015
    • Santa Clara University School of Law, J.D., summa cum laude, 2018
    • University of California, Santa Barbara, B.A., Phi Sigma Alpha, 2015
    • Santa Clara University School of Law, J.D., summa cum laude, 2018

    • California
    • California

Anna's Insights

Webinar | 10.16.25

The Artificial Intelligence Agenda from Capitol Hill to State Capitals: Where We Are and Where We Are (Probably) Going

The landscape of AI governance and regulation is shifting. Following the release of the White House’s “America’s AI Action Plan” in July 2025 and the President’s signing of related Executive Orders, the White House has emphasized (at least rhetorically) a preference for innovation, adoption, and deregulation. But that does not tell the entire story. The Administration remains committed to exercising a heavy hand in AI, including by banning the U.S. government’s procurement of so-called “woke AI,” intervening in the development of data centers and the export of the AI technology stack, imposing an export fee for certain semiconductors to China, and assuming a stake in a U.S. semiconductor company. State legislatures are also racing to implement their own regulations, particularly around AI’s use in critical areas, such as healthcare, labor and employment, and data privacy. The many sources of regulation raise the specter of a fragmented compliance environment for businesses. This webinar will delve into the Administration’s AI strategy, going beyond the headlines to analyze:...

View All Insights

Insights

Webinar | 10.16.25

The Artificial Intelligence Agenda from Capitol Hill to State Capitals: Where We Are and Where We Are (Probably) Going

Blog Post | 08.01.25

White House AI Action Plan Seeks to Establish “Dominance,” Boost Innovation, and Scrutinize Regulations

Client Alert | 16 min read | 07.25.25

White House AI Action Plan Seeks to Establish “Dominance,” Boost Innovation, and Scrutinize Regulations

Publication | 07.17.25

Texas Just Created A New Model For State AI Regulation

View All Insights

Practices

Industries

Anna's Insights

Webinar | 10.16.25

The Artificial Intelligence Agenda from Capitol Hill to State Capitals: Where We Are and Where We Are (Probably) Going

The landscape of AI governance and regulation is shifting. Following the release of the White House’s “America’s AI Action Plan” in July 2025 and the President’s signing of related Executive Orders, the White House has emphasized (at least rhetorically) a preference for innovation, adoption, and deregulation. But that does not tell the entire story. The Administration remains committed to exercising a heavy hand in AI, including by banning the U.S. government’s procurement of so-called “woke AI,” intervening in the development of data centers and the export of the AI technology stack, imposing an export fee for certain semiconductors to China, and assuming a stake in a U.S. semiconductor company. State legislatures are also racing to implement their own regulations, particularly around AI’s use in critical areas, such as healthcare, labor and employment, and data privacy. The many sources of regulation raise the specter of a fragmented compliance environment for businesses. This webinar will delve into the Administration’s AI strategy, going beyond the headlines to analyze:...

View All Insights