Insights
Professional
Practice
Industry
Region
Trending Topics
Location
Type
Sort by:
Firm News 2 results
Firm News | 4 min read | 10.14.25
Crowell Earns Top Rankings from Legal 500 United Kingdom 2026
London – October 14, 2025: Crowell & Moring U.K. LLP has been recommended in five practice areas in the Legal 500 United Kingdom 2026.
Firm News | 2 min read | 10.07.24
Crowell Earns Top Rankings from Legal 500 United Kingdom 2025
Crowell & Moring U.K. LLP has been recommended in five practice areas in the Legal 500 United Kingdom 2025.
Client Alerts 3 results
Client Alert | 8 min read | 10.10.25
Investing in UK Defence – Under Regulatory Scrutiny
The UK’s increased defence spending and zero-tariff trade on aircraft parts with the US is generating broad interest in the UK defence sector.
Client Alert | 4 min read | 07.11.25
The U.S.-UK Trade Deal – So Far
On this 4thof July, Britain was also celebrating. The first country to secure a trade deal with the Trump Administration, the U.K. can indeed celebrate the so-called Special Relationship.
Client Alert | 4 min read | 10.23.23
Holding Iran Accountable for Hamas Terrorist Attacks
The world has watched in horror as tragedy has unfolded in Israel because of the brutal terrorist attacks carried out by Hamas. Nothing can compensate for the devastating loss of life, for the trauma suffered by those injured or kidnapped, or for the grief, sorrow, fear, and anger felt by family members. For the past twenty-five years, American victims or family members have held Iran accountable in U.S. courts for its sponsorship and support of murderous and terrorist acts like those carried out by Hamas in Israel. The U.S. legal system may again be a vehicle to hold Iran and its proxies to account today.
Events 1 result
Event | 10.12.23
Seventeenth Annual Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Debate & Discussion
This coming December, the withdrawal of France, Germany, and Poland from the Energy Charter Treaty will take effect. Leaders in each of these states claimed withdrawal was necessary because ECT obligations were hindering efforts to combat anthropomorphic-driven climate change. Was this stated justification correct as a matter of international investment law?
