1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Third Thursday: Supreme Court 2024 – A Recap and a Look Forward

Third Thursday: Supreme Court 2024 – A Recap and a Look Forward

Webinar | 07.18.24, 12:00 PM EDT - 1:00 PM EDT

Address

Virtual

View On Demand Here

Please join us for the next edition of Third Thursday – Crowell & Moring’s Labor and Employment Update, a webinar series dedicated to helping our clients stay on top of developing law and emerging compliance issues.

The U.S. Supreme Court has issued several decisions this year implicating substantive employment law and procedural issues that affect important aspects of employment law litigation.  These key decisions include:

  • Muldrow v. St. Louis, in which the Court lowered the burden for plaintiffs to establish an adverse employment action in a Title VII discrimination claim.
  • Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC, which clarified the requirements of whistleblower claims under the Sarbanes Oxley Act.
  • Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney, setting a rigorous standard that must be applied for any injunctions sought by the NLRB against employers in alleged unfair labor practice cases.
  • Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer, addressing questions related to the ability of “tester” plaintiffs to bring disability discrimination claims.  

In this month’s program, our panelists will discuss the Court’s significant opinions from this term and what they will mean for employers and employment law, and we will also provide a preview of the Court’s docket for next year.  

For more information, please visit these areas: Labor and Employment

Participants

Insights

Webinar | 10.16.25

The Artificial Intelligence Agenda from Capitol Hill to State Capitals: Where We Are and Where We Are (Probably) Going

The landscape of AI governance and regulation is shifting. Following the release of the White House’s “America’s AI Action Plan” in July 2025 and the President’s signing of related Executive Orders, the White House has emphasized (at least rhetorically) a preference for innovation, adoption, and deregulation. But that does not tell the entire story. The Administration remains committed to exercising a heavy hand in AI, including by banning the U.S. government’s procurement of so-called “woke AI,” intervening in the development of data centers and the export of the AI technology stack, imposing an export fee for certain semiconductors to China, and assuming a stake in a U.S. semiconductor company. State legislatures are also racing to implement their own regulations, particularly around AI’s use in critical areas, such as healthcare, labor and employment, and data privacy. The many sources of regulation raise the specter of a fragmented compliance environment for businesses. This webinar will delve into the Administration’s AI strategy, going beyond the headlines to analyze:...

View All Insights