1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Merger Control in Europe and the Americas – Trends and Reforms Ignited by Tech

Merger Control in Europe and the Americas – Trends and Reforms Ignited by Tech

Webinar | 06.16.22, 4:00 PM CEST - 6:00 PM CEST

In response to the digital revolution and the increasing impact technology has on business, Competition Authorities on both sides of the Atlantic are stepping up merger control enforcement. They are revising current policies, advocating for more aggressive use of existing rules to their full potential effect, and calling for new laws and regulations where they see the need. What does this mean for companies engaging in transactions in the digital marketplace and other industries? Is it becoming harder to predict if a deal will be subject to merger control? Are some deals more likely to receive enhanced scrutiny than others? And, what are the broader implications for all sectors when Competition Authorities push the boundaries on traditional theories of harm and remedies, and prohibitions become more commonplace?    

To explore these questions and more, please join King’s College London and Crowell & Moring, for this year’s Fifth Annual EU Competition Law Conference, which will focus on merger control trends and reforms in the EU, the UK and the Americas. This follows a conference which Crowell & Moring organized in December 2021 jointly with the George Washington University Competition Law Centre, which looked at developing merger practice in the US specifically.

This conference will be hosted virtually and is complimentary.

The Conference will be divided into a panel discussion with two segments and a Fireside Chat, as follows:

Segment One: The first panel will focus on the evolving merger control process, including jurisdictional issues and institutional coordination.

Moderators:

  • Alison Jones, Professor of Law, King’s College London
  • Karel Bourgeois, Partner, Crowell & Moring LLP, Brussels

Segment Two: The second panel will discuss trends in merger standards and assessments, including new theories of harm and increased attention for potential competition and innovation.

Moderators:

  • Renato Nazzini, Professor of Law, King’s College London
  • Peter Broadhurst, Partner, Crowell & Moring LLP, London and Brussels

Panelists:

  • Youenn Beaudouin, Case Handler, Mergers Case Support & Policy, European Commission
  • Krisztian Katona, Vice President of Global Competition and Regulatory Policy, Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA)
  • Pierre Larouche, Professor of Innovation and Law, Université de Montréal
  • Richard Romney, Director of Mergers, Competition and Markets Authority
  • Vanessa Turner, Senior Advisor Competition, The European Consumer Organisation (BEUC)

Fireside Chat: The panel discussions will be followed by a concluding Fireside Chat, reflecting on the panel discussions and what it all means for future merger enforcement.

Moderators:

  • William E. Kovacic, Global Competition Professor of Law and Policy, and Director, George Washington University Competition Law Center; and Visiting Professor, King's College London
  • Andrew I. Gavil, Professor, Howard University School of Law; and Senior Of Counsel at Crowell & Moring LLP
  • Jeane A. Thomas, Partner, Crowell & Moring LLP, Washington D.C. and Brussels

Participants:

  • Jonathan B. Baker, Research Professor of Law, American University’s Washington College of Law
  • Andrea Gomes da Silva, Senior Advisor, Brunswick Group; Special Advisor at PLMJ; and Owner, Turl Advisory LDA

For more information, please visit these areas: Antitrust and Competition — Brussels Practice, Antitrust Mergers and Acquisitions, Antitrust and Competition

Insights

Webinar | 10.16.25

The Artificial Intelligence Agenda from Capitol Hill to State Capitals: Where We Are and Where We Are (Probably) Going

The landscape of AI governance and regulation is shifting. Following the release of the White House’s “America’s AI Action Plan” in July 2025 and the President’s signing of related Executive Orders, the White House has emphasized (at least rhetorically) a preference for innovation, adoption, and deregulation. But that does not tell the entire story. The Administration remains committed to exercising a heavy hand in AI, including by banning the U.S. government’s procurement of so-called “woke AI,” intervening in the development of data centers and the export of the AI technology stack, imposing an export fee for certain semiconductors to China, and assuming a stake in a U.S. semiconductor company. State legislatures are also racing to implement their own regulations, particularly around AI’s use in critical areas, such as healthcare, labor and employment, and data privacy. The many sources of regulation raise the specter of a fragmented compliance environment for businesses. This webinar will delve into the Administration’s AI strategy, going beyond the headlines to analyze:...