Can an Intelligible Distinction Between Legislative Rules and Guidance be Articulated?
Webinar | 04.26.18, 8:00 AM EDT - 9:30 AM EDT
The difference between a legislative rule, i.e., a rule that creates binding obligations with legal consequences for non-compliance, and an interpretative rule, i.e., a rule that interprets but does not itself legislate, is an important one. Among other things, agencies must typically give public notice of the former and allow the public an opportunity to comment before issuing them in the final form; not so of the latter. But in application the distinction is sometimes difficult to discern, especially where an agency issues "guidance" that it portrays as "interpretative" of existing authority but which, practically speaking, creates new binding norms. So-called "policy statements" sometimes give rise to the same mischief. This D.C. Bar program will address this topic and the not-entirely-consistent federal jurisprudence surrounding it.
Partner Dan Wolff will participate as a speaker.
For more information, please visit these areas: Litigation and Trial, Administrative Law
Participants
Insights
Webinar | 04.30.25
This presentation will provide an overview of recent AG ESG enforcement activity, enforcement trends, and explain how and why AG ESG priorities are important to business of all types.
Webinar | 04.22.25
Webinar | March 27, 2025
Challenges and Opportunities for Health Care Companies in a Changing Global Trade Environment
Webinar | March 26, 2025
Navigating the Complexities of Employment Law Impacting Geographically-Dispersed Workforces