Turning AIS off - insurance and contractual repercussions by GMICC
Event | 11.04.21, 4:30 PM UTC - 6:30 PM UTC
Address
America Square Conference Centre
Aldgate and Bishopsgate Rooms, Crosswall, London EC3
The Global Marine Insurance Claims Community (GMICC) is hosting an inaugural hybrid event 'Turning AIS off - insurance and contractual repercussions' on Thursday 04 November, 2021.
The hybrid event will be hosted both in person at America Square in London and virtually with a great speaker line-up of Keith Hart, Director at Hart Marine Consultants Ltd, Michelle Linderman, our partner at Crowell & Moring LLP in London, David Bolomini, Group Secretariat, International Group of P&I Clubs, Chris Zavos, partner at Kennedys and Roar Sanden, a lawyer & Director Adjusting at Norwegian Hull club. The session will be moderated by Alistair Johnston, Director at Campbell Johnston Clark and Chair of the GMICC Committee.
Background of the Event
Although the continuous operation of a ship’s Automatic Identification System (AIS) is mandatory under SOLAS, there are circumstances where it may be legitimately switched off. But what are the insurance and contractual repercussions of such action?
The guest speakers will highlight objectives such as terms of breach of flag state regulation, insurance warranties and who has rights and who is ultimately responsible, as well as considering the impact of maritime advisories issued by HM Treasury’s Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) and by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) on the manipulation of AIS by those engaged in sanctions evasion.
GMICC is an organisation for international 'day to day' practitioners involved in the marine claims industry whether insurers, brokers, P&I clubs or the many and varied service providers whose expertise is crucial to the fair and effective management of marine insurance claims.
For more information, please visit these areas: Insurance / Reinsurance
Contact
Insights
Event | 02.20.25
Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today
Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.
Event | 12.05.24
Event | 12.03.24
