1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |The Case for Diverse Attorneys: Improving Retention & Fostering Professional Development

The Case for Diverse Attorneys: Improving Retention & Fostering Professional Development

Event | 11.20.24, 6:00 PM EST - 8:30 PM EST | CLE Offered

Address

Crowell & Moring
Two Manhattan West, 375 9th Ave, New York, NY 10001

During New York Arbitration Week, ArbitralWomen and Crowell & Moring will host a substantive discussion and reception entitled “The Case for Diverse Attorneys: Improving Retention and Fostering Professional Development.

Panelists:
Randa Adra, Partner, Crowell & Moring (New York)
Katherine BellPartner, Schellenberg Wittmer (Zurich)
Andrea Cardani, Partner, AlixPartners (New York)
Julianne Jaquith, Partner, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan (Houston)
Christian Leathley, Partner, Herbert Smith Freehills (New York)
David Perla, Vice Chair, Burford Capital (New York)

For more information, please visit these areas: International Dispute Resolution, International Dispute Resolution, International Arbitration, International Litigation

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.