1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Recent Shifts and Lessons Learned in DOJ Enforcement Priorities and New Changes to California Legal Ethics Rules

Recent Shifts and Lessons Learned in DOJ Enforcement Priorities and New Changes to California Legal Ethics Rules

Event | 01.09.19, 1:30 PM EST - 3:30 PM EST

Address

Crowell & Moring
515 South Flower Street, 40th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071

Please join William Chang, partner at Crowell & Moring LLP and former DOJ White-collar federal prosecutor, Peter Roan, Health Care partner at Crowell Moring LLP, and Shari Aberle, Deputy General Counsel at Optum, to learn about DOJ Enforcement Priorities in 2019 as well as the 2019 Changes to California Ethics rules. The Ethics portion of the presentation will include a summary of the new California Rules of Professional Conduct effective November 1, 2018. The presentation will also cover preserving attorney-client privilege and work product protections in investigations.

For more information, please visit these areas: Litigation and Trial

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.