1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Federal Bar Council presents The Risks and Rewards of Litigation Funding: Emerging Legal and Ethical Issues in a Rapidly Growing Area of Law

Federal Bar Council presents The Risks and Rewards of Litigation Funding: Emerging Legal and Ethical Issues in a Rapidly Growing Area of Law

Event | 04.11.24, 6:00 PM EDT - 7:40 PM EDT | CLE Offered

Address

Crowell New York Office
375 Ninth Avenue New York, NY 10001-0193 US

“Litigation financing” is really just . . . “financing.” And it's not just for “plaintiff firms” anymore. As more AmLaw 200 firms take on plaintiff-side cases, they turn to financing to pay their hourly rates or reduce the risk of litigating long-term, complex cases. Some firms encourage their clients to obtain financing, while others need financing to take on contingency matters. Litigation funding is a significant force in the civil litigation landscape that all practitioners need to understand.

Judicial Moderator

The Honorable Denny Chin
U.S. Court of Appeals

Panelists

Paul B. Haskel, Esq.
Crowell & Moring LLP

Chandra Metzler
CM Squared LLC

James Q. Walker, Esq.
Perkins Coie LLP

Owen Glist, Esq.
Constantine Cannon LLP

Coordinator

Robin Zwerling, Esq.
Zwerling, Schachter & Zwerling, LLP

Federal Bar Council Program Committee Co-Chairs

Celeste Koeleveld, Esq.
Clifford Chance US LLP

Julian S. Brod, Esq.
Shapiro Arato Bach LLP

For more information, please visit these areas: Financial Services

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.