Deep Dive: Class Actions in Belgium – Three Years of Case Law : First Lessons & Recent Developments
Event | 05.31.18, 11:30 AM CEST - 3:30 PM CEST
Address
Crowell & Moring
Rue Joseph Stevens 7, 1000 Brussels
The Act of 28 March 2014 introduced a collective redress mechanism in the Belgian Code of Economic law, allowing groups of consumers having suffered damage from a common cause to file a collective claim for damages through a group representative, more commonly known as a class action.
The scope of the Belgian collective redress action will soon be extended to SMEs that employ fewer than 250 employees and have an annual turnover of less than €50 million or have a total annual balance sheet of less than €43 million. SMEs as well as self-employed individuals are thereby given the same opportunity as consumers, to file a collective action against an undertaking which caused them damage.
Although this legislative innovation will ensure better protection of the rights of self-employed individuals and SMEs, the extension will, on the other hand, significantly increase the litigation risk for companies. Collective redress lawsuits involve a number of complex procedural issues and can have a significant impact on the organisation of the companies being sued.
This deep dive will address the main procedural elements of the Belgian collective redress system and recent case law, as well as its future expansion to SMEs and self-employed individuals. This deep dive will further provide an opportunity to hear class action practitioners discuss effective strategies for preparing its defense against a collective redress action.
For more information, please visit these areas: Corporate and Commercial — Brussels Practice, Brussels Practice
Participants
Insights
Event | 02.20.25
Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today
Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.
Event | 12.05.24
Event | 12.05.24
Event | 12.04.24
Inside the Arbitrators’ Chambers: Best Practices of Arbitrators