1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |"AI and The Evolving Enforcement Landscape: Key Updates" ACI Inaugural AI Law, Ethics and Compliance Conference

"AI and The Evolving Enforcement Landscape: Key Updates" ACI Inaugural AI Law, Ethics and Compliance Conference

Event | 10.31.23 - 11.01.23

Address

DC Bar Association
901 4th Street NW
Washington, D.C. 20001

AI continues to evolve at an exponential rate, and it’s imperative that you have your playbook to put into action. This must-attend conference is unlike any other-bringing together all key stakeholders for discussions on the most pressing, high stakes issues and uncertain risk factors.

Join Michael Atkinson as he interviews enforcement official, Michael Atleson, Attorney in the FTC Division of Advertising Practices at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) as they discuss key updates in AI and The Evolving Enforcement Landscape.

Save 10% - Register with Discount Code: S10-610-610L24.S

For more information, please visit these areas: White Collar and Regulatory Enforcement, Privacy and Cybersecurity

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.