The New Bounty Hunters: Congress Creates New Incentives to Report Securities and Commodities Fraud
Client Alert | 2 min read | 07.15.10
Earlier today, the U.S. Senate passed the conference report for H.R. 4173, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. In a little-discussed piece of this sweeping financial reform legislation, Congress authorized the creation of two new bounty programs that will provide substantial monetary awards to whistleblowers who provide information that leads to an enforcement action with monetary sanctions exceeding $1,000,000 imposed by either the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (Sec. 922) or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) (Sec. 748). These bounty hunter provisions, which are expected to be signed into law by President Obama next week, are broadly drafted and could have far-reaching application to cases involving accounting fraud, disclosure violations, and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
The provisions are similar to qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act, which provide a bounty for whistleblowers who provide information about government procurement fraud, and the SEC bounty program already in place to reward whistleblowers who report insider trading. They provide a financial incentive to individuals with information about securities and commodities violations to provide that information to government regulators. However, unlike the False Claims Act, to qualify for an award, the new bounty hunters must provide “original information” to the SEC or CFTC rather than filing a case themselves. Thus, the potential financial rewards remain while the risk and expense of filing a lawsuit have been removed.
When a whistleblower provides original information leading to a monetary sanction exceeding $1,000,000, they can collect between 10% and 30% of that sanction, which has been defined to include civil monetary penalties, disgorgement, and interest. Under the new law, the SEC and CFTC will have discretion to determine the whistleblower award, taking into account (1) the significance of the information provided; (2) the level of assistance the whistleblower provided; (3) the government’s interest in deterring securities law violations; and (4) other relevant factors the SEC or CFTC may establish by regulation.
Despite the far-reaching impact of this provision, certain categories of people are ineligible, including those convicted of a crime related to the reported conduct, and employees of financial regulatory agencies such as the SEC, the Department of Justice, self-regulatory organizations such as FINRA, national stock exchanges, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, law enforcement agencies and outside auditors who gain knowledge of the reported information during the course of an audit.
The new bounty hunters also will have enhanced protection against retaliation under the new law. This includes the ability to seek relief for retaliation by bringing an independent action for relief in U.S. District Court.
Regardless of merit, these new bounty hunter incentives will undoubtedly prompt more company insiders to report suspected wrongdoing to the SEC and CFTC. As such, all companies regulated by the SEC and CFTC are well advised to be increasingly vigilant in their compliance and training efforts to decrease the risk of costly and distracting SEC or CFTC investigations.
Insights
Client Alert | 1 min read | 01.10.25
FAR Council Withdraws Proposed Mandatory Climate Disclosures for Federal Contractor Rule
Mandatory climate disclosures for US federal contractors are officially off the table—at least, for the foreseeable future. On January 10, 2025, the Department of Defense, General Services Administration, and National Aeronautics and Space Administration announced that they are withdrawing a proposed rule, “Disclosure of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate-Related Financial Risk,” which would have required thousands of federal contractors to inventory and publicly disclose their Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and would also have required “major” contractors to also establish and validate GHG emission-reduction targets tailored to the goals of the Paris Agreement. The proposed rule, discussed in further detail here, was introduced in November 2022 and resulted in thousands of public comments from the government contractor community and beyond.
Client Alert | 7 min read | 01.10.25
New Draft Guidance From FDA Explains When an Accelerated Approval Trial Is “Underway”
Client Alert | 11 min read | 01.10.25
Client Alert | 7 min read | 01.09.25
Navigating Disputes on Megaprojects Amid Trump Tariffs - Part 2