1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |The Dockworkers’ Strike and Safeguarding Your Rights

The Dockworkers’ Strike and Safeguarding Your Rights

Client Alert | 1 min read | 10.03.24

At midnight on October 1, 2024, the International Longshoremen’s Association launched a labor strike that effectively shut down all ports from Maine to Texas after being unable to reach agreement on terms for a new labor contract with the United States Maritime Alliance.  This strike may impact virtually all industries that rely on maritime shipping, either directly or indirectly. 

Government contractors should be cognizant of their rights since shipping delays resulting from the strike could affect their performance.  If a contract incorporates FAR 52.249-14, Excusable Delays, or one of the FAR Default clauses, such as FAR 52.249-8, Default (Fixed-Price Supply and Service), then delays that are attributable to the dockworkers’ strike should be excusable, and contract performance times extended.  However, if the delay is attributable to a subcontractor whose performance is impacted by the dockworkers’ strike, then a prime contractor may need to consider the possibility of procuring supplies from an alternative supplier.  Contractors should use their best efforts to timely notify their respective contracting officers of any performance impacts and request additional time to perform, as well as document any directions they receive from the contracting officer.

The FAR’s Excusable Delay clause and the Default clauses do not address monetary relief for excusable delays.  However, certain circumstances may change the calculus, such as where the government does not grant extensions when appropriate, or when certain warranties made by the government were breached as a result of the strike.  Thus, it is important to provide notice to the government in the event of delays caused by the strike, and it is worthwhile in any notice of impact to the government to reserve the right to seek an equitable adjustment for cost and schedule impacts, as applicable.

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 10.02.24

Gov. Newsom Vetoes AI Bill but Leaves the Door Open to Future CA Regulation

On Sunday, September 29, 2024, California Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoed SB 1047, a bill to enact the Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act. Although the bill passed the California Assembly and Senate, it generated significant controversy and debate within the tech community. The Center for AI Safety, Elon Musk, the L.A. Times editorial board, and San Francisco-based AI startup Anthropic all supported the bill; while Meta, OpenAI, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi opposed it as hindering innovation....