Taking Care of Business (Systems): DoD Proposes to Change the Definition of a Business System Deficiency
Client Alert | 1 min read | 06.28.24
The Department of Defense (DoD) recently announced that it seeks public comments on a proposed change to the contractor business systems regime. The proposed rule would amend the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) by replacing the phrase “significant deficiency” with the new defined term “material weakness,” to mean “a deficiency or combination of deficiencies in the internal control over information in contractor business systems, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of such information will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis.” In addition, the term would provide that a “reasonable possibility exists when the likelihood of an event occurring is— (1) Probable; or (2) More than remote but less than likely.”
Comments are due no later than August 26, 2024. The full text of the notice is available here.
The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 requires that the DFARS business systems clauses implement criteria for contractors’ accounting, cost estimating, material management & accounting, earned value management, purchasing, and property management systems. The clauses allow the government to temporarily withhold payment on a covered contract if a significant deficiency in a business system is identified. Currently, the DFARS contractor business systems clauses define “significant deficiency” as “a shortcoming in the system that materially affects the ability of officials of the [DoD] to rely upon information produced by the system that is needed for management purposes.”
Over the past few years, DoD has increased its focus on reviews of contractor business systems, leading to an uptick in findings of significant deficiencies. Indeed, DCAA’s FY 2023 Report to Congress identified business systems reviews as one of DCAA’s top three priorities. The proposed rule change, required by the FY 2021 NDAA, purports to create consistency with generally accepted auditing standards and reduce DoD and contractor confusion about the seriousness of deficiencies.
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 02.20.25
On February 18, President Trump issued an Executive Order titled “Ensuring Accountability for All Agencies”[1] that directs independent agencies (as well as Cabinet Departments and their sub-agencies) to route all “proposed and final significant regulatory” and budgetary actions through the White House and the Office of Management and Budget. If implemented to its full extent, this action will significantly strengthen the authority of the White House by weakening the political autonomy of these independent agencies. As an assertion of the President’s inherent powers under Article II of the U.S. Constitution, it also stands to weaken congressional influence over these independent agencies, both through the appropriations and confirmation processes.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 02.20.25
State Attorneys General Issue Multistate Guidance on Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility
Client Alert | 2 min read | 02.19.25
District Court Grants Temporary Reprieve to USAID Implementing Partners
Client Alert | 7 min read | 02.19.25
Trump Administration Seeks Input from Public on National Artificial Intelligence Action Plan