1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Section 889 Roll-Out Continues with OMB Revised Guidance for Federal Grants and Agreements

Section 889 Roll-Out Continues with OMB Revised Guidance for Federal Grants and Agreements

Client Alert | 1 min read | 08.13.20

Today, August 13, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) published a series of changes to the OMB Guidance for Grants and Agreements, including the addition of 2 CFR 200.216, Prohibition on certain telecommunication and video surveillance services or equipment, which prohibits grant and loan recipients and subrecipients from using federal funds to enter into, or renew, contracts for equipment, services, or systems that use covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system or critical technology as part of any system. This change is intended to implement the prohibition on Huawei, ZTE, and other covered telecommunications equipment and services issued in the 2019 National Defense Authorization Act Section 889. OMB has added a new definition for telecommunications and video surveillance costs and has clarified that costs for telecommunications and video surveillance services or equipment are allowable except for covered telecommunications equipment and services which are unallowable. Federal awarding agencies are required to prioritize funding for entities to transition from covered communications equipment and services, to procure replacement equipment and services, and to ensure the communication service to users and customers is sustained.

For additional information about recent Section 889 updates, see Crowell’s previous alerts:

FAR Council Published 2019 NDAA Section 889(a)(1)(B) Interim Rule Further Prohibiting Use of Huawei, ZTE, and Others’ Telecommunications Technology by Contractors

GSA Requiring Mass Modification to MAS Solicitation and Will Issue Mass Bilateral Modifications to All Multiple Schedule Contracts to Prohibit Use of Huawei/ZTE Equipment

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.03.26

Important EU Court Judgment Clarifies Rules on Interest Due in Cartel Damages Cases

In a judgment that will have direct and immediate consequences, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has clarified that for all competition damages actions brought after 26 December 2014, interest runs from the date on which the harm occurred. The ruling addressed two important questions: (1) whether national provisions implementing Article 3(2) of the EU Damages Directive — which requires interest to run from the date harm occurred —apply to cases in which the harm preceded the adoption of those provisions; and (2) how the date of harm should be determined in cartel cases involving the purchase of goods at inflated prices....