SBA Issues Application Forms for New and "Second-Draw" PPP Loans
Client Alert | 1 min read | 01.11.21
On January 8, 2021, the Small Business Administration (SBA) issued revised Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) Borrower Application forms for new “first-draw” loans and “second-draw” loans for prior PPP borrowers. SBA and the Treasury Department also announced that the PPP will re-open the week of January 11 for new borrowers and certain existing PPP borrowers eligible for second-draw loans.
Congress has set aside $284 billion for this next round of PPP loans. At the outset, in furtherance of Congress’ expressed intent to provide access to underserved communities, only community financial institutions will be able to make first-draw loans starting on Monday, January 11, and second-draw loans on Wednesday, January 13. The PPP will open to all lenders shortly thereafter. While this new round of loans is theoretically open through March 31, 2021, prospective borrowers are reminded that the initial round of PPP funding in April 2020 dried up quickly.
As discussed in prior alerts, this latest round of PPP funding comes with changes to borrower eligibility requirements (which differ between first and second-draw loans), the use of loans proceeds, loan forgiveness coverage, the loan forgiveness application for loans under $150,000, and more. Borrowers should pay close attention to the new requirements and be prepared to submit supporting documentation in response to a future audit for, among other things, the economic necessity of its new loan request.
Crowell & Moring stands ready to assist with any questions regarding the new loan applications, the eligibility requirements for either first or second-draw loans, the myriad “good faith” certifications required in the applications, or any other questions arising from the application process.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 7 min read | 08.16.24
Over the past several years, federal courts have increasingly questioned the authority of administrative law judges (ALJs) to adjudicate alleged violations of certain labor and employment statutes. In the last several weeks, two U.S. district courts in Texas issued decisions halting unfair labor practice proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) on the grounds that NLRB ALJs lack the constitutional authority to preside over such actions due to unconstitutional protections against their removal.[1] Similarly, the last year has seen several decisions by courts in the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits finding that ALJs, whose decisions are not reviewable by a Presidential appointee, lack constitutional authority under the Appointments Clause to adjudicate claims.[2] The trend illustrated by these decisions, combined with the Supreme Court’s decision in June to abandon the Chevron doctrine of extending deference to federal agency rule-making proceedings, portend significant changes in the way employers interact with federal agencies that enforce labor and employment law.
Client Alert | 2 min read | 08.15.24
Department of Defense Plans Increased Investment in Clean Energy
Client Alert | 7 min read | 08.15.24
