Roadmap For Electric Utility Pandemic Response Planning
Client Alert | 1 min read | 05.15.20
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Department of Energy, North American Electric Reliability Corporation and the North American Transmission Forum issued an Epidemic/Pandemic Response Plan Resource (“Resource”) yesterday, providing guidance to plan for and respond to an epidemic or pandemic event. It outlines planning, response, and recovery strategies, and recommended actions in scenarios ranging from a small outbreak to a severe pandemic outbreak, to complement business continuity plans and protect personnel health and safety.
While the Resource is directed primarily to electric transmission organizations in light of COVID-19, it also could guide the pandemic planning of other critical infrastructure sectors, such as generators, to ensure uninterrupted operations and business functions during a pandemic.
Many preparation and mitigation strategies outlined in the Resource could be developed by the electric industry more broadly in advance of a pandemic event, including:
- identifying essential positions, work schedule plans, and contingency plans;
- establishing work from home policies and workplace sanitation procedures; and
- developing strategies to maintain cyber and physical security during a pandemic.
It also provides a template for a documented epidemic/pandemic response plan that would outline roles and responsibilities, pre-event planning, response, and recovery. While this Resource comes in the middle of the COVID-19 response and recovery, it seems likely that regulatory authorities will expect or require owners and operators of electric infrastructure to have documented epidemic/pandemic plans in the future, and the Resource provides a roadmap for such plans. Crowell & Moring’s Coronavirus Resource Center is available to help companies navigate the rapidly evolving business, legal and operational challenges associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, and looking forward, companies owning or operating electric infrastructure should review and consider the Resource’s roadmap in developing their epidemic and pandemic response plans.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.12.25
Eleventh Circuit Hears Argument on False Claims Act Qui Tam Constitutionality
On the morning of December 12, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit heard argument in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., No. 24-13581 (11th Cir. 2025). This case concerns the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam provisions and a groundbreaking September 2024 opinion in which the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the FCA’s qui tam provisions were unconstitutional under Article II. See United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Fla. Med. Assocs., LLC, 751 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (M.D. Fla. 2024). That decision, penned by District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, was the first success story for a legal theory that has been gaining steam ever since Justices Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh indicated they would be willing to consider arguments about the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Res., 599 U.S. 419 (2023). In her opinion, Judge Mizelle held (1) qui tam relators are officers of the U.S. who must be appointed under the Appointments Clause; and (2) historical practice treating qui tam and similar relators as less than “officers” for constitutional purposes was not enough to save the qui tam provisions from the fundamental Article II infirmity the court identified. That ruling was appealed and, after full briefing, including by the government and a bevy of amici, the litigants stepped up to the plate this morning for oral argument.
Client Alert | 8 min read | 12.11.25
Director Squires Revamps the Workings of the U.S. Patent Office
Client Alert | 8 min read | 12.10.25
Creativity You Can Use: CJEU Clarifies Copyright for Applied Art
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.10.25
Federal Court Strikes Down Interior Order Suspending Wind Energy Development

