1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |New FAR Part 40 to Address Supply Chain and Information Security Requirements

New FAR Part 40 to Address Supply Chain and Information Security Requirements

Client Alert | 1 min read | 04.15.24

On April 1, 2024, the Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration (GSA), and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) issued a final rule updating the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to add Part 40 on information security and supply chain security. This first action did not implement any new requirements; however, separate rulemakings will follow to relocate existing information security and supply chain security policies and procedures to the new Part 40. Additionally, new related regulations will be housed in Part 40. These actions suggest that the flow of information security and supply chain regulations is likely to continue unabated for at least the next few years.

As noted, Part 40 will consolidate the various information security and supply chain security regulations currently distributed throughout the FAR. It ultimately will include regulations concerning prohibitions, exclusions, supply chain risk information sharing, safeguarding information, and supply chain security requirements. For example, the Section 889 prohibition and policies would be placed in Part 40, as would provisions implementing Federal Acquisition Supply Chain Security Act exclusion and removal orders.

Supply chain and information risks that are not considered to be related to security, such as labor restrictions, climate risks, and human trafficking, will not be in Part 40 and will continue to be covered in other parts of the FAR.

Insights

Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.04.25

District Court Grants Preliminary Injunction Against Seller of Gray Market Snack Food Products

On November 12, 2025, Judge King in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington granted in part Haldiram India Ltd.’s (“Plaintiff” or “Haldiram”) motion for a preliminary injunction against Punjab Trading, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Punjab Trading”), a seller alleged to be importing and distributing gray market snack food products not authorized for sale in the United States. The court found that Haldiram was likely to succeed on the merits of its trademark infringement claim because the products at issue, which were intended for sale in India, were materially different from the versions intended for sale in the U.S., and for this reason were not genuine products when sold in the U.S. Although the court narrowed certain overbroad provisions in the requested order, it ultimately enjoined Punjab Trading from importing, selling, or assisting others in selling the non-genuine Haldiram products in the U.S. market....