ISP-Liability & Media Law
Client Alert | 2 min read | 02.04.10
Other sections of this issue:
Privacy & Data Protection | ISP-Liability & Media Law | Contracts & E-Commerce |
Electronic Communications & IT
In the Netherlands, the Council of Ministers decided to legally define the right of journalists to protect their sources.
Introduction
Although Dutch case law already recognized the right of journalists to protect their sources, the Dutch Council of Ministers decided to legally define this right. With this legal definition, the Council of Ministers aims at more clarity and certainty for journalists.
Who is concerned?
Only those persons that are professionally active in journalistic activities will benefit from the right to protect their sources. As such, the enactment would be more strict than the protection granted by case law. Before, the criterion to be professionally active was of no importance. It was sufficient to address yourself to a large audience and to act in the public interest to be granted the right to protect your sources.
Scope of the protection
The journalist will only obtain the right to protect his source if the data destined for disclosure to the public is communicated to the journalist in pursuance of his profession. Moreover, the right for the journalist to protect his source can also be limited for reasons of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, etc.
Entry into force
The Council of Ministers agreed to have the State Council advice on the proposed act before introducing it with the Parliament for voting. Thus, there are still some steps to be taken before the right to protect sources is legally defined. Until that moment, it will be up to case law to judge whether or not journalists may protect their sources.
References: Press release from the Dutch government of 4 December 2009
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 2 min read | 11.14.24
SEC ESG Enforcement Is Still Alive
On November 8, 2024 the SEC announced a settled enforcement action against Invesco Advisers, Inc. for making misleading statements about its integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors into the firm’s investment decisions. Invesco agreed to pay a $17.5 million civil penalty to settle the matter. This enforcement action makes it clear that, even though the SEC dissolved its ESG Task Force, the Commission continues to monitor firms’ statements and representations for misleading statements about ESG.
Client Alert | 8 min read | 11.12.24
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.11.24
Allegations of a Litany of Lyin’: Penn State Settles Claims of Cybersecurity Noncompliance
Client Alert | 1 min read | 11.08.24
A Common-Sense Change to the Continuous SAM Registration Requirement at FAR 52.204 7
