IRS Delays Implementation of Unpopular Roth Catch-up Requirements under SECURE 2.0
What You Need to Know
Key takeaway #1
For 2024 and 2025, 401(k), 403(b) and governmental 457(b) plans will be deemed to comply with section 603 of the SECURE 2.0 Act’s requirements that higher wage earners make only Roth catch-up contributions, even if those individuals make pre-tax catch-up contributions during those years.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 08.28.23
The IRS has delayed the implementation of § 603 of the SECURE 2.0 Act (“Act”), which requires certain highly paid plan participants to make Roth (rather than pre-tax) catch-up contributions beginning in 2024. In short, the IRS has provided an “administrative transition period” during 2024 and 2025 whereby individuals who made more than $145,000 in FICA wages during the prior year can continue to make pre-tax catch-up contributions. This is great news for employers and those taxpayers who would have been forced into Roth catch-up contributions.
Background: At the end of 2022, Congress passed the Act as part of a larger end of year spending bill. See here for a summary of the Act. Among numerous other changes, the Act provided that, effective for plan years starting after 2023, catch-up contributions must be treated as Roth contributions for employees whose prior year wages (as determined under § 3121(a)) exceeded $145,000. For employees making more than that amount, pre-tax deferrals will be capped at the regular 401(k) limit. Presumably, the tax revenue generated by eliminating the pre-tax feature for the higher paid workers was intended to help offset the costs of the other aspects of the legislation.
On Friday August 26, 2023, the IRS released Notice 2023-62 which provides an “administrative transition period” until 2026 during which a participant who is otherwise eligible to make catch-up contributions will be treated as satisfying the requirements under the Code even if those contributions are made on a pre-tax basis by someone with prior year wages over $145,000. In other words, compliance with the new Roth catch-up restrictions under for higher-paid employees is delayed until 2026.
Open Issues: In the Notice, the IRS also confirmed that additional guidance is forthcoming and will address the following implementation issues. Employers and taxpayers will have the opportunity to provide comments.
- Partners and Self-Employed Workers. As discussed above, the Act’s limitation on pre-tax catch up contributions applies only to individuals with wages under § 3121(a) during the preceding year. Because 3121(a) wages are defined as “renumeration for employment,” the clear language of § 603 of the Act should not apply to self-employed taxpayers (e.g., partners) or to any other individuals who are not engaged in “employment” as defined in in § 3121(b). One would assume that future guidance would merely parrot the clear and unambiguous statutory language on these points.
- Auto-conversion. The IRS indicated that it will consider guidance on the issue of whether an individual who elects to make catch-up contributions will be deemed to elect Roth contributions for such amount to the extent the employee is not eligible to make such contributions on a pre-tax basis.
- Multiple employer issues. The IRS also intends to issue guidance for complying with the new catch-up limitations for individuals that participate in plans maintained by more than one employer, such as multiemployer union plans.
What Sponsors Should Do Today: Reach out to your 401(k), 403(b) or (for governmental employers) 457(b) plan administrator regarding communications surrounding 2024 and catch-up contributions. For sponsors with partners or other non-employed individuals with unique issues under the Act, we recommend submitting a comment letter to the IRS to help direct and clarify future guidance on your particular issue.
Insights
Client Alert | 14 min read | 11.01.24
Protectionist Trade Policies in the New Administration: A Question of Degree
Regardless of what happens in the U.S. elections on November 5, one theme is clear – protectionist policies in international trade are here to stay. To some extent, the key difference between the trade policies of a Harris administration and a second Trump Administration may be one of degree. Vice President Harris is expected to continue the more cautious, incremental approach to trade policy favored by the Biden Administration. A second Trump administration, on the other hand, is expected to pick up where it left off and aggressively use the trade tools at its disposal to try to reset and renegotiate trade relationships with many of the U.S.’s trading partners—particularly those countries with whom the U.S. has a trade deficit.
Client Alert | 23 min read | 10.31.24
Client Alert | 11 min read | 10.30.24
Are You, and Your Supply Chain, Ready for the Deforestation Regulation?
Client Alert | 4 min read | 10.30.24
Trends in Recent FDA Warning Letters for Cosmetic and Cosmetic-Adjacent Products