GSA Clarifies Permissibility of Upfront Payments for Software-as-a-Service Offerings
Client Alert | 1 min read | 04.18.24
On March 15, 2024, the General Services Administration (GSA) issued Acquisition Letter MV-2024-01 providing guidance to GSA contracting officers on the use of upfront payments for acquisitions of cloud-based Software-as-a-Service (SaaS). Specifically, this acquisition letter clarifies that despite statutory prohibitions against the use of “advance” payments outside of narrowly-prescribed circumstances, upfront payments for SaaS licenses do not constitute an “advance” payment subject to these restrictions when made under the following conditions:
- access to the software is granted contemporaneously with payment (i.e., delivery of the license is made contemporaneously with payment);
- the license is acquired under a fixed-price or fixed-price with economic price adjustment, even if other portions of the task order or contract are not fixed price;
- the license is priced at a single seat, multi-seat, unit, or subscription price covering a fixed term, defined as “a limited period of time”;
- the license’s pricing/billing model allows for no utilization or consumption metric other than quantity to affect the costs incurred over the negotiated term;
- the license does not require any upfront payment other than the fixed seat, unit, or subscription cost as a prerequisite for access or a pricing discount; and
- within end user or other license agreements, the licensed service is continuous and uninterrupted for the negotiated term of access to the license.
This guidance follows Acquisition Letter MV-21-06, which permitted federal agencies to order cloud computing services on a consumption basis through GSA’s Federal Supply Schedule program (and eliminated application of the Price Reductions Clause to such offerings), and it represents the latest in a series of steps by GSA to better align the federal government’s acquisition practices for information services with customary commercial practices.
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 04.14.25
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) enforcement has been fairly predictable for many years as the Fraud Section of the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) has maintained exclusive authority over investigating claims and bringing enforcement actions in federal courts across the country. President Trump’s recent pause on FCPA enforcement, the first of its kind since the statute was passed in 1977, has created significant uncertainty for individuals and businesses operating internationally regarding the future of FCPA enforcement. While DOJ is in the process of assessing what the future of FCPA enforcement, state attorneys general are stepping in. On April 2, California Attorney General Rob Bonta issued a Legal Advisory (the “Advisory) to California businesses explaining that violations of the FCPA are actionable under California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL). The announcement signals a shift in FCPA enforcement where states may take the lead and pursue FCPA enforcement through their state unfair competition laws.
Client Alert | 4 min read | 04.10.25
Hikma and Amici Curiae Ask Supreme Court to Revisit Induced Infringement by Generic “Skinny Labels”
Client Alert | 1 min read | 04.09.25
Client Alert | 12 min read | 04.09.25