Grand Jury Returns Second FCPA Indictment of Former Alcatel Executives
Client Alert | 2 min read | 03.21.07
Yesterday, a Miami federal grand jury indicted a second former executive of Alcatel, S.A., a French telecommunications company, for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The indictment supersedes a December 2006 indictment of another former Alcatel executive and charges both with conspiring to make over $2.5 million in indirect payments through a foreign “consulting” firm to Costa Rican officials in order to obtain a telecommunications contract on Alcatel’s behalf.
This prosecution provides a reminder of several lessons for companies engaged in international business activity in the context of the Department of Justice’s increased vigilance in prosecuting FCPA violations in recent months.
First, the case highlights the broad jurisdictional scope of the FCPA and the minimal U.S. contacts needed to support an FCPA prosecution. The companies and executives were citizens of, and located in, foreign countries, and the alleged conduct took place outside the United States. Still, the DOJ alleged that Alcatel’s trading of American Depositary Shares (ADRs) on the New York Stock Exchange, and the use by its executives of New York and Miami banks to channel the alleged payments to foreign officials, were sufficient to bring the case within the FCPA’s reach.
Second, the case is a reminder to companies of the risks involved in conducting business with state-owned or operated utilities or other business entities or in countries where such state involvement is prevalent. In this case, the “foreign official” who received the alleged payments was a director of the Costa Rican state-owned telecommunications authority and an advisor to a senior Costa Rican government official.
Third, the DOJ’s attention to “commission” payments made by Alcatel to the Costa Rican “consulting” firm that ultimately transferred funds to government officials highlights the particular risks associated with consultancy and other agency arrangements in the FCPA context. It is critical for company management to understand the nature (and to ensure proper recording) of all payments to outside entities retained to assist in business activities abroad.
There is no sign that the DOJ’s recent spate of FCPA prosecutions is slowing down. To the contrary, the DOJ’s public statements and recent actions demonstrate that FCPA prosecution is one of its highest priorities. This most recent case reinforces the lesson that due diligence on agents and counterparties and a comprehensive system of internal controls, as well as an effective compliance and training program, remain the best defense against FCPA prosecution.
Click here to read today’s DOJ press release.
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 04.21.25
DOJ Secures First Criminal Wage-Fixing Conviction in Home Health Care Staffing Case
In a landmark verdict on April 14, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division notched its first-ever jury trial conviction for criminal wage-fixing under the Sherman Act in United States v. Eduardo Lopez in the District of Nevada. A home health care staffing executive, Eduardo (“Eddie”) Lopez, was found guilty of (1) conspiring with several competing home healthcare staffing agencies to fix the wages of home health nurses in the Las Vegas area, and (2) defrauding the unwitting buyer of his agency by concealing the then-ongoing antitrust investigation into nurse wage and hiring practices. It is worth noting, however, that while the Lopez conviction is a significant milestone for the DOJ’s campaign into labor antitrust violations, wage-fixing cases may be more straightforward to prosecute than no-poach agreements, where the DOJ still has not prevailed before a jury. This victory nonetheless affirms the DOJ’s ability to criminally prosecute labor market collusion as a criminal offense after numerous failed attempts, signaling the prudence of further caution for companies and individuals to mitigate risk in labor antitrust markets.
Client Alert | 6 min read | 04.18.25
Client Alert | 2 min read | 04.18.25
Client Alert | 2 min read | 04.17.25