FTC Announces New HSR and Section 8 Thresholds
Client Alert | 13 min read | 01.24.23
The Federal Trade Commission announced yesterday the most significant changes to the jurisdictional thresholds and filing fees applicable to the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the HSR Act) in several decades.
The HSR Act requires that certain large transactions be notified to the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission prior to their consummation. This year, the minimum "size-of-transaction" threshold for reporting mergers and acquisitions will increase substantially from $101 million to $111.4 million. The "size-of-person" threshold will also increase.
Notifications made under the HSR Act also require the payment of a filing fee, which has historically increased annually based on changes to the U.S. consumer price index. Pursuant to the recently-enacted Fee Modernization Act, the FTC has adopted a new structure—increasing the number of tiers from three to six—and including significant changes to the filing fees themselves. The new structure marginally reduces the filing fees required for smaller transactions, but dramatically increases those required for the largest deals. For example, in 2022, the largest filing fee of $280,000 was required for transactions valued at approximately $1 billion or more. This year, the largest filing fee will be $2.25 million, applicable to transactions valued at $5 billion or more. More detail is included in the chart below.
This new fee structure is expected to significantly increase the total sum of filing fees—with the Congressional Budget Office estimating the changes will generate an additional $1.4 billion in payments from 2023 through 2027—and which will significantly increase the funding and resources available to the FTC and DOJ to enforce the antitrust laws. Under the new structure, HSR filing fees will be increased annually by an amount equal to the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index, if any, as determined by the Department of Labor.
The revised thresholds were published in the Federal Register on January 26, 2023, and become effective thirty days after publication on the next business day, February 27, 2023.
The Commission also issued revised thresholds relating to the prohibition of certain interlocking directorates under Section 8 of the Clayton Act.
Click here to read a full copy of the Commission's announcement, including a complete listing of the revised thresholds. Click here for a copy of the FTC's announcement and information regarding the Clayton Act, Section 8 thresholds.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.12.25
Eleventh Circuit Hears Argument on False Claims Act Qui Tam Constitutionality
On the morning of December 12, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit heard argument in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., No. 24-13581 (11th Cir. 2025). This case concerns the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam provisions and a groundbreaking September 2024 opinion in which the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the FCA’s qui tam provisions were unconstitutional under Article II. See United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Fla. Med. Assocs., LLC, 751 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (M.D. Fla. 2024). That decision, penned by District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, was the first success story for a legal theory that has been gaining steam ever since Justices Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh indicated they would be willing to consider arguments about the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Res., 599 U.S. 419 (2023). In her opinion, Judge Mizelle held (1) qui tam relators are officers of the U.S. who must be appointed under the Appointments Clause; and (2) historical practice treating qui tam and similar relators as less than “officers” for constitutional purposes was not enough to save the qui tam provisions from the fundamental Article II infirmity the court identified. That ruling was appealed and, after full briefing, including by the government and a bevy of amici, the litigants stepped up to the plate this morning for oral argument.
Client Alert | 8 min read | 12.11.25
Director Squires Revamps the Workings of the U.S. Patent Office
Client Alert | 8 min read | 12.10.25
Creativity You Can Use: CJEU Clarifies Copyright for Applied Art
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.10.25
Federal Court Strikes Down Interior Order Suspending Wind Energy Development
