FDA Tightens the Rules for Antibody (Serology) Test Manufacturers
Client Alert | 1 min read | 05.05.20
EDIT The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) walked back its policy that allowed COVID-19 antibody test kits to enter the market without agency review. In its original March 16 Final Guidance, FDA allowed commercial manufacturers to market and sell antibody test kits after internally validating their own products and notifying FDA. The Agency did not require emergency use authorization (EUA) as it did with PCR (molecular) testing, though seeking an EUA was “encouraged.”
The updated Final Guidance requires manufacturers to submit a completed EUA request within ten business days of notification to FDA that the assay has been successfully validated, or the date of publication of the guidance, whichever is later. This requirement applies even to already-marketed tests that did not previously receive EUAs. The Guidance states that if FDA becomes aware of questions or concerns about a test after notification, such as poor performance or misleading statements about the test, FDA will communicate those concerns to the manufacturer and provide the manufacturer an opportunity to address the questions or concerns. If the concerns cannot be or have not been addressed in a timely manner, and the manufacturer has already distributed the test, FDA would expect the manufacturer to suspend distribution of the test.
Appendix A to the Guidance offers a template for manufacturers’ submissions to FDA. The Appendix states that the clinical agreement data should be provided using at least 30 antibody positive samples for each immunoglobulin claimed and 75 antibody negative samples. The test should demonstrate a minimum overall 90.0% positive percent agreement and overall 95.0% negative percent agreement. In other words, tests should be able to accurately detect at least 90% of positive patients and produce false positives less than 5% of the time.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 14 min read | 11.01.24
Protectionist Trade Policies in the New Administration: A Question of Degree
Regardless of what happens in the U.S. elections on November 5, one theme is clear – protectionist policies in international trade are here to stay. To some extent, the key difference between the trade policies of a Harris administration and a second Trump Administration may be one of degree. Vice President Harris is expected to continue the more cautious, incremental approach to trade policy favored by the Biden Administration. A second Trump administration, on the other hand, is expected to pick up where it left off and aggressively use the trade tools at its disposal to try to reset and renegotiate trade relationships with many of the U.S.’s trading partners—particularly those countries with whom the U.S. has a trade deficit.
Client Alert | 23 min read | 10.31.24
Client Alert | 11 min read | 10.30.24
Are You, and Your Supply Chain, Ready for the Deforestation Regulation?
Client Alert | 4 min read | 10.30.24
Trends in Recent FDA Warning Letters for Cosmetic and Cosmetic-Adjacent Products