1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |FDA Tightens the Rules for Antibody (Serology) Test Manufacturers

FDA Tightens the Rules for Antibody (Serology) Test Manufacturers

Client Alert | 1 min read | 05.05.20

EDIT The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) walked back its policy that allowed COVID-19 antibody test kits to enter the market without agency review. In its original March 16 Final Guidance, FDA allowed commercial manufacturers to market and sell antibody test kits after internally validating their own products and notifying FDA. The Agency did not require emergency use authorization (EUA) as it did with PCR (molecular) testing, though seeking an EUA was “encouraged.”

The updated Final Guidance requires manufacturers to submit a completed EUA request within ten business days of notification to FDA that the assay has been successfully validated, or the date of publication of the guidance, whichever is later. This requirement applies even to already-marketed tests that did not previously receive EUAs. The Guidance states that if FDA becomes aware of questions or concerns about a test after notification, such as poor performance or misleading statements about the test, FDA will communicate those concerns to the manufacturer and provide the manufacturer an opportunity to address the questions or concerns. If the concerns cannot be or have not been addressed in a timely manner, and the manufacturer has already distributed the test, FDA would expect the manufacturer to suspend distribution of the test.

Appendix A to the Guidance offers a template for manufacturers’ submissions to FDA. The Appendix states that the clinical agreement data should be provided using at least 30 antibody positive samples for each immunoglobulin claimed and 75 antibody negative samples. The test should demonstrate a minimum overall 90.0% positive percent agreement and overall 95.0% negative percent agreement. In other words, tests should be able to accurately detect at least 90% of positive patients and produce false positives less than 5% of the time.

Insights

Client Alert | 8 min read | 06.30.25

AI Companies Prevail in Path-Breaking Decisions on Fair Use

Last week, artificial intelligence companies won two significant copyright infringement lawsuits brought by copyright holders, marking an important milestone in the development of the law around AI. These decisions – Bartz v. Anthropic and Kadrey v. Meta (decided on June 23 and 25, 2025, respectively), along with a February 2025 decision in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence – suggest that AI companies have plausible defenses to the intellectual property claims that have dogged them since generative AI technologies became widely available several years ago. Whether AI companies can, in all cases, successfully assert that their use of copyrighted content is “fair” will depend on their circumstances and further development of the law by the courts and Congress....