European Merger Control in Times of COVID-19: Delays Until Further Notice
Client Alert | 3 min read | 04.24.20
As many are working from home, so are the officials from the European Commission and many national competition authorities. These new working arrangements pose some challenges to the functioning of the authorities, and in particular to merger control proceedings in which they are bound by strict deadlines. Some competition authorities already suspended these deadlines. Others are asking companies to hold off on new merger notifications. Below we provide you with an overview of the measures announced as of April 24, 2020.
The European Commission encourages companies to delay merger notifications originally planned until further notice, where possible. The Commission expects delays in the collection of information from third parties, such as customers, competitors and suppliers. In addition, Commission officials may face some challenges accessing information as they are working remotely as of March 16, 2020. The Commission reportedly suspended three Phase II merger investigations due to companies failing to comply with information deadlines.
The Belgian Competition Authority also encourages companies to delay merger notifications when they are not urgent A similar statement was made by the German competition authority and the Lithuanian competition authority. Likewise, the competition authority in Ireland called on companies to delay filing until further notice. Where it is not possible to delay notification, the authority requests notifications be submitted in electronic format.
The Austrian competition authority has not requested to delay merger notifications, but the review period for mergers which were notified between March 23 and April 30, will only start running on May 1, 2020 (including applications to initiate Phase II) (here).
The Danish competition authority has suspended deadlines for merger control until May 10. The Italian competition authority previously suspended all deadlines from February 23 until April 15. The suspension has been further extended by a month to May 15. The French competition authority has suspended merger control deadlines as of March 12, 2020 until one month after the expiration of the state of emergency. Likewise, the deadlines in Serbia have been suspended as of March 24, 2020 until 30 days from the termination of the state of emergency.
In Poland, legislation was passed which suspended deadlines for mergers notified before March 14 and deadlines for mergers notified after that date will only start running after the state of emergency has ended. In Norway, merger deadlines have temporarily been extended due to the COVID-19 outbreak. The new deadlines apply until October 31, 2020.
The Spanish competition authority announced interruptions and delays in administrative proceedings due to the state of alarm in the country. It remains possible to continue proceedings to avoid harming the legitimate interests of the parties, or in situations closely linked to the state of alarm (e.g. to protect the general interest or the functioning of basic services). The Portuguese competition authority is also impacted by the state of emergency in the country. All statutory deadlines have been suspended from March 13, 2020, but the authority continues to conduct its operations.
The Czech competition authority does not plan to ask companies not to file new notifications as they hope to manage them within normal time limits. Neither does the Latvian authority, which has not announced any possible delays. In Sweden, the review periods also remain unaffected. The same goes for the Swiss and UK competition authorities which will continue to monitor the situation. However, we understand the UK authority has encouraged companies in individual cases to hold off on formally filing merger notifications.
Crowell & Moring will continue monitoring developments in this area and provide regular updates.
Insights
Client Alert | 2 min read | 11.14.24
SEC ESG Enforcement Is Still Alive
On November 8, 2024 the SEC announced a settled enforcement action against Invesco Advisers, Inc. for making misleading statements about its integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors into the firm’s investment decisions. Invesco agreed to pay a $17.5 million civil penalty to settle the matter. This enforcement action makes it clear that, even though the SEC dissolved its ESG Task Force, the Commission continues to monitor firms’ statements and representations for misleading statements about ESG.
Client Alert | 8 min read | 11.12.24
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.11.24
Allegations of a Litany of Lyin’: Penn State Settles Claims of Cybersecurity Noncompliance
Client Alert | 1 min read | 11.08.24
A Common-Sense Change to the Continuous SAM Registration Requirement at FAR 52.204 7