EPA Continues to Push Toward Regulation of PFAS By Proposing Two More New Rules Under RCRA
What You Need to Know
Key takeaway #1
The proposed rules are a significant step toward EPA’s national regulation of a number of PFAS in the realm of investigation and cleanup authority.
Key takeaway #2
If these rules successfully list all 9 PFAS in Appendix VIII, then we can expect EPA to next designate these chemicals as listed hazardous wastes under RCRA, which automatically classifies them as hazardous substances under CERCLA, resulting in CERCLA cleanup authority.
Key takeaway #3
The proposed rules would have the most immediate impact on hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (TSDFs) already subject to various RCRA waste management requirements. The proposed rules identify 1,740 TSDFs facilities that could be subject to additional RCRA corrective action requirements following adopted of these rules.
Client Alert | 4 min read | 02.06.24
On January 31, 2024, EPA Administrator Michael Regan signed two proposed rules related to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and corrective action authority under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). These rulemakings follow from a 2021 announcement covered in a prior Crowell client alert, adding to the growing number of pending PFAS-related proposals submitted by EPA.
PFAS Rule: Proposal to List a Total of Nine PFAS as RCRA Hazardous Constituents
The first proposed rule, “Listing of Specific PFAS as Hazardous Constituents” (EPA-HQ-OLEM-2023-0278), would list nine PFAS as “hazardous constituents” in RCRA’s Appendix VIII, 40 CFR Part 261. Listing a substance as a hazardous constituent is a preliminary step toward classifying it as a hazardous waste, which is regulated closely under RCRA’s cradle-to-grave tracking system and would result in cleanup authority under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). To classify PFAS as hazardous waste, EPA must still consider several enumerated factors after finalizing this rule to determine whether the substances are “capable of posing a substantial present or potential threat to human health or the environment when improperly treated, stored, transported, disposed of, or otherwise managed.” 40 C.F.R. § 261.11(a)(3). It is unclear when these rules will be adopted.
Note, however, that EPA previously submitted other pending proposed rules regarding certain PFAS that are expected to be approved shortly. They are:
- The rule proposing the designation of PFOA and PFOS as CERCLA hazardous substances; this rule is anticipated to be approved before the summer of 2024. See Proposed Rule submitted in 2022.
- The rule proposing a PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation for PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, GenX, PFHxS, and PFBS, and also proposing health-based maximum contaminant level goals (MCLGs) for these six PFAS. See Proposed Rule submitted in 2023.
Regarding listing PFAS as hazardous constituents, EPA initially named the following four PFAS in its October 26, 2021, proposed rule announcement:
1. Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
2. Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS)
3. Perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (PFBS)
4. GenX.
Last week’s newly proposed rule names five additional PFAS, bringing the total to nine:
5. Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA)
6. Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS)
7. Perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA)
8. Perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA)
9. Perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA)
A Listing Prepublication Copy covering all nine PFAS is currently available from EPA. Once the official version is published on the Federal Register, it will be open for public comment for 60 days. This publication covers a wide range of information, including, “Does this action apply to me?”, “Impacts of the Proposed Rule”, and “What are the incremental costs and benefits of this action?” EPA’s stated objective in this new PFAS rule “is to ensure that releases of those substances can be effectively and efficiently considered and addressed through corrective action.” See Listing Prepublication Copy, p.19.
RCRA Rule: Proposal to Clarify Authority to Order Investigation & Cleanup Under RCRA’s Corrective Action Program
The second proposed rule, “Definition of Hazardous Waste Applicable to Corrective Action for Releases from Solid Waste Management Units” (EPA-HQ-OLEM-2023-0085), would clarify that the RCRA Corrective Action Program has the authority to require investigation and cleanup of “hazardous waste” as defined by RCRA section 1004(5). This aims to resolve an ambiguity between the RCRA section 1004(5) statutory definition and the RCRA Subtitle C regulatory definition, codifying an agency interpretation in line with prior guidance. Although this proposed rule does not specifically address PFAS, it would be a companion action facilitating the use of RCRA corrective action authority to address PFAS once classified as a RCRA hazardous waste. A Definition Prepublication Copy of the proposed rule is currently available from EPA; once the official version is published on the Federal Register, it will be open for public comment for 30 days.
Crowell, with its team of experienced energy and environmental regulatory, investigation, and enforcement attorneys, will continue to monitor any developments and provide updates on the Administration’s PFAS measures.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 1 min read | 01.10.25
FAR Council Withdraws Proposed Mandatory Climate Disclosures for Federal Contractor Rule
Mandatory climate disclosures for US federal contractors are officially off the table—at least, for the foreseeable future. On January 10, 2025, the Department of Defense, General Services Administration, and National Aeronautics and Space Administration announced that they are withdrawing a proposed rule, “Disclosure of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate-Related Financial Risk,” which would have required thousands of federal contractors to inventory and publicly disclose their Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and would also have required “major” contractors to also establish and validate GHG emission-reduction targets tailored to the goals of the Paris Agreement. The proposed rule, discussed in further detail here, was introduced in November 2022 and resulted in thousands of public comments from the government contractor community and beyond.
Client Alert | 7 min read | 01.10.25
New Draft Guidance From FDA Explains When an Accelerated Approval Trial Is “Underway”
Client Alert | 11 min read | 01.10.25
Client Alert | 7 min read | 01.09.25
Navigating Disputes on Megaprojects Amid Trump Tariffs - Part 2