EPA Considers Updating Federal Procurement Guidelines for Recycled Content
Client Alert | 2 min read | 04.16.20
On April 7, 2020, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a notice in the Federal Register requesting comments on federal procurement guidelines that designate products that are or can be produced with “recovered materials” and set forth recommended practices for purchasing such items. Recovered materials are those waste materials that have been recovered or diverted from the solid waste stream. The procurement guidelines are required under section 6002 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), which established the “buy recycled” program to use Federal purchasing power to stimulate the demand for products made with recovered materials. Federal agencies, as well as state and local agencies and government contractors, that use appropriated funds to purchase $10,000 or more of designated items are required to purchase items containing recovered materials to the fullest extent possible.
The public comment period closes on July 6, 2020.
Within one year after EPA’s designation of an item in a comprehensive procurement guideline, federal agencies are required, also under section 6002 of RCRA, to revise their procurement specifications. Agencies are also required to develop an affirmative procurement program for the purchasing of items with recovered, or recycled, content. The Office of Federal Procurement Policy is responsible for coordinating implementation across the Federal government to maximize the purchase of items containing recovered materials.
EPA currently has comprehensive procurement guidelines for eight categories of products:
- Paper and paper products
- Vehicular products
- Construction products
- Transportation products
- Park and recreation products
- Landscaping products
- Non-paper office products
- Miscellaneous products (including awards and plaques, bike racks, and signage)
In 1993, President Clinton issued Executive Order 12873 (“Federal Acquisition, Recycling, and Waste Prevention”), which directed agency heads to consider use of environmentally preferred products, waste prevention, and life cycle costs as part of their program and acquisition plans. It also established a formal process for EPA to use in developing and updating the comprehensive procurement guidelines and establishing recovered material advisory notices that provide a range of recovered content levels that are available for the designated items.
Between 1995 and 2007, EPA issued five comprehensive procurement guidelines covering 61 products. EPA has not updated the comprehensive procurement guidelines or recovered material advisory notices since 2007. In 2019, EPA released its National Framework for Advancing the U.S. Recycling System, a plan to bolster recycling infrastructure and strengthen the secondary materials markets.
EPA is seeking comment on whether the right items have been designated, whether products should be added or deleted based on what agencies are actually procuring, and if the specifications for recycled content contained in the recovered material advisory notices are appropriate.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.12.25
Eleventh Circuit Hears Argument on False Claims Act Qui Tam Constitutionality
On the morning of December 12, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit heard argument in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., No. 24-13581 (11th Cir. 2025). This case concerns the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam provisions and a groundbreaking September 2024 opinion in which the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the FCA’s qui tam provisions were unconstitutional under Article II. See United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Fla. Med. Assocs., LLC, 751 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (M.D. Fla. 2024). That decision, penned by District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, was the first success story for a legal theory that has been gaining steam ever since Justices Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh indicated they would be willing to consider arguments about the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Res., 599 U.S. 419 (2023). In her opinion, Judge Mizelle held (1) qui tam relators are officers of the U.S. who must be appointed under the Appointments Clause; and (2) historical practice treating qui tam and similar relators as less than “officers” for constitutional purposes was not enough to save the qui tam provisions from the fundamental Article II infirmity the court identified. That ruling was appealed and, after full briefing, including by the government and a bevy of amici, the litigants stepped up to the plate this morning for oral argument.
Client Alert | 8 min read | 12.11.25
Director Squires Revamps the Workings of the U.S. Patent Office
Client Alert | 8 min read | 12.10.25
Creativity You Can Use: CJEU Clarifies Copyright for Applied Art
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.10.25
Federal Court Strikes Down Interior Order Suspending Wind Energy Development
