Enhanced Requirement to Report Counterfeit, Suspect Counterfeit, and Nonconforming Goods
Client Alert | 2 min read | 11.25.19
In an effort to further harden the critical-to-mission component supply chain, a new FAR clause published November 22 finalizes a FAR provision that dramatically expands the mandatory reporting of counterfeit and certain nonconforming parts to the Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP) and, in some instances, the relevant contracting officer. Although DFARS 252.246-7007, Contractor Counterfeit Electronic Part Detection and Avoidance System, requires GIDEP reporting, the clause is narrowly tailored to defense contractors and to counterfeit electronic parts only. The new FAR rule expands GIDEP reporting to all contractors, to non-electronic counterfeit and suspect counterfeit parts, and to other nonconformances.
At a high level, the clause will be included in procurements conducted by any agency—including the DoD—for: (1) items subject to FAR clause 52.246-11, Higher-Level Contract Quality Requirement; (2) items identified by the contracting officer as critical items; (3) electronic parts and end items, components, parts or assemblies containing electronic parts; and (4) services where the contractor will furnish, as part of the service, any of items (1)-(3). The new reporting obligations will be triggered by a contractor or subcontractor’s identification of certain counterfeit and suspect counterfeit goods, as well as and goods with major nonconformances (defined as those likely to result in failure of the supplies or materially reduce usability) or critical nonconformances (defined as those likely to result in hazardous or unsafe conditions or prevent performance of a vital mission). The final rule is more narrow in scope than the proposed rule released in 2014. Specifically, unlike the proposed rule, the final rule explicitly excludes procurements for commercial items, medical devices subject to FDA reporting, and commercially-available off-the-shelf items.
Additionally, contractors are now required to review the GIDEP database so they may be able to investigate and remove suspect parts from the supply chain. In response to questions about this process, the Government has recommended using Batch Match to monitor for any references to components or parts of interest. Contractors should be prepared in the coming month to review and revise their existing counterfeit parts programs or establish a counterfeit parts program to comply with the new rule. The new rule will go into effect on December 23, 2019.
We will be conducting a webinar on December 17 to discuss this rule and its implications. More detail about the webinar to follow.
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 04.14.25
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) enforcement has been fairly predictable for many years as the Fraud Section of the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) has maintained exclusive authority over investigating claims and bringing enforcement actions in federal courts across the country. President Trump’s recent pause on FCPA enforcement, the first of its kind since the statute was passed in 1977, has created significant uncertainty for individuals and businesses operating internationally regarding the future of FCPA enforcement. While DOJ is in the process of assessing what the future of FCPA enforcement, state attorneys general are stepping in. On April 2, California Attorney General Rob Bonta issued a Legal Advisory (the “Advisory) to California businesses explaining that violations of the FCPA are actionable under California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL). The announcement signals a shift in FCPA enforcement where states may take the lead and pursue FCPA enforcement through their state unfair competition laws.
Client Alert | 4 min read | 04.10.25
Hikma and Amici Curiae Ask Supreme Court to Revisit Induced Infringement by Generic “Skinny Labels”
Client Alert | 1 min read | 04.09.25
Client Alert | 12 min read | 04.09.25