DOJ and FTC Warn Companies to Avoid Anticompetitive Employment Practices During COVID-19 Pandemic
Client Alert | 2 min read | 04.16.20
In a joint statement, the U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission recognized that protecting the health, safety and welfare of Americans during the COVID-19 crisis will require unprecedented cooperation among governmental and private sector entities. In doing so, however, the agencies cautioned companies that “COVID-19 does not provide a reason to tolerate anticompetitive conduct that harms workers,” including medical professionals, first responders, and other essential service providers. Thus, while praising companies and individuals that have “demonstrated extraordinary compassion and flexibility in responding to COVID-19,” the agencies stated that they “will not hesitate to hold accountable” those that “may use [the crisis] to prey on American workers by subverting competition in labor markets.”
In their joint statement, the DOJ and FTC indicated that they will be monitoring whether employers, staffing agencies, and recruiters engage in anticompetitive employment practices – including naked wage-fixing and no-poach agreements – that harm workers during the COVID-19 crisis. The agencies stated that they are particularly concerned about agreements among employers to lower the compensation, benefits, or hours worked for healthcare professionals and those who work in grocery stores, pharmacies, delivery and distribution networks, warehouses, and other essential sectors. Companies and individuals involved in such agreements could face criminal prosecution. The agencies also promised to bring civil enforcement actions against companies and individuals that invite others to collude when it comes to employee recruitment and compensation even if such an invitation is not accepted.
The DOJ and FTC further indicated that they may use their civil enforcement authority to challenge unilateral anticompetitive conduct by employers that harms competition in a labor market during the COVID-19 crisis. Such unilateral conduct could include a large employer’s use of its monopsony power in a labor market to artificially suppress wages or to unreasonably limit the employment opportunities for permanent or temporary workers through overly broad or unnecessary non-compete clauses.
The DOJ and FTC’s decision to issue this warning during the COVID-19 pandemic appears to be a continuation of the agencies’ focus on increasing their enforcement efforts in the employment context, which the agencies have made a top priority since issuing their Antitrust Guidance for Human Resources Professionals in October 2016.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25
On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25

