1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Congress Has Spoken: DoD Unilateral Definitizations are Appealable Government Claims

Congress Has Spoken: DoD Unilateral Definitizations are Appealable Government Claims

Client Alert | 1 min read | 01.15.25

In a big change for defense contractors, Congress has amended 10 U.S.C. § 3372 to make clear that a Department of Defense (DoD) contracting officer’s unilateral definitization of an undefinitized contract action is directly appealable to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) or the Court of Federal Claims. Congress’s change (made under Section 803 of the Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025) (we report on the FY 2025 NDAA here) is contrary to recent ASBCA and Federal Circuit decisions.

Contractors often are in the position of negotiating undefinitized contract actions (at times for years) only to have contracting officers unilaterally definitize at a low price.  Under prior board and court decisions, a contractor seeking to challenge a unilateral definitization first had to submit a separate claim to the contracting officer, disputing the reasonableness of the government’s action.  That process imposed further delay and burden on the contractor.

Now, under the amended statute, dispute resolution is more efficient and balanced.  A contracting officer’s unilateral definitization is a directly appealable government claim, enabling contractors to challenge the contracting officer’s action without going through additional procedural hurdles (only to have the same contracting officer reaffirm the prior decision).

Additionally, because a contracting officer’s unilateral definitization is a government claim, the government will arguably carry the initial burden of supporting the reasonableness of its unilateral price.  In the end though, both the government and contractors will likely be required to proffer evidence to support the reasonableness of their respective prices.

Congress’s change to the definitization process will benefit contractors by creating a more efficient review process and requiring contracting officers to justify unilateral definizations. 

Insights

Client Alert | 4 min read | 04.14.25

A New Sheriff in Town: State Attorneys General Take Action To Enforce Violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) enforcement has been fairly predictable for many years as the Fraud Section of the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) has maintained exclusive authority over investigating claims and bringing enforcement actions in federal courts across the country. President Trump’s recent pause on FCPA enforcement, the first of its kind since the statute was passed in 1977, has created significant uncertainty for individuals and businesses operating internationally regarding the future of FCPA enforcement. While DOJ is in the process of assessing what the future of FCPA enforcement, state attorneys general are stepping in. On April 2, California Attorney General Rob Bonta issued a Legal Advisory (the “Advisory) to California businesses explaining that violations of the FCPA are actionable under California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL). The announcement signals a shift in FCPA enforcement where states may take the lead and pursue FCPA enforcement through their state unfair competition laws....