California Salary History Ban Enacted, Effective January 1, 2018
Client Alert | 1 min read | 10.13.17
On October 12, 2017, Gov. Jerry Brown signed into law California’s salary privacy law, which prohibits California employers from seeking or relying on salary history information, including compensation and benefits, about an applicant for employment. Agents of the employer—including headhunters and recruiters—are likewise prohibited from seeking salary history information. While the law states that employers may still consider or rely on salary history information if it is voluntarily provided by the applicant, without prompting, employers should be cautious about doing so unless they can clearly demonstrate that the information was volunteered, without prompting, by the applicant. The new law also requires employers to provide applicants, upon reasonable request, with a pay scale for the positions they seek.
The legislation, which adds Section 432.3 to California’s Labor Code, will go into effect on January 1, 2018. California employers should therefore move quickly to revise employment applications as needed, and to provide appropriate training to Human Resources professionals, recruiters, and others involved in the recruitment and hiring process.
California joins Massachusetts, Oregon, Delaware, Puerto Rico, San Francisco, and New York City in passing laws which ban employers from inquiring about an applicant’s current or former salaries – a trend that we expect to continue throughout the country. Implementation of a comparable law in Philadelphia is currently stayed pending a federal lawsuit by the Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce on grounds that it violates the First Amendment, the Due Process Clause, the Commerce Clause, and Pennsylvania’s Constitution.
Gov. Brown has yet to make a decision regarding AB 1209, the Gender Pay Gap Transparency Act, which the Senate approved on September 11, 2017. That bill, if signed, would require employers to collect data on the mean and median salaries paid to women and men with the same job title or description, which information would be published by the Secretary of State and thus available to the public. We continue to monitor the status of this and other laws impacting employers.
For further information or advice concerning compliance with state and local salary history ban laws, please contact the professional(s) listed below, or your regular Crowell & Moring contact.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 03.25.26
NAIC Intensifies AI Regulatory Focus: What Health Insurance Payors Need to Know
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) is intensifying its oversight of how insurers use AI — and the pace of regulatory activity shows no signs of slowing. Over the past several months, the NAIC has published a formal Issue Brief staking out its position on federal AI legislation, launched a multistate AI Evaluation Tool pilot aimed at examining insurers’ AI governance programs, and continued to expand adoption of its AI Model Bulletin across state lines. These developments continue a trend towards enhancing regulation; the NAIC adopted AI Principles in 2020 and a Model Bulletin in 2023 clarifying that existing insurance laws apply to AI systems and establishing expectations for governance, documentation, testing, and third-party oversight. That Model Bulletin has now been adopted in approximately 24 states.
Client Alert | 11 min read | 03.25.26
White House National AI Policy Framework Calls for Preempting State Laws, Protecting Children
Client Alert | 3 min read | 03.24.26
California Considering A Massive Expansion of Its Antitrust Laws
Client Alert | 2 min read | 03.23.26



