California Salary History Ban Enacted, Effective January 1, 2018
Client Alert | 1 min read | 10.13.17
On October 12, 2017, Gov. Jerry Brown signed into law California’s salary privacy law, which prohibits California employers from seeking or relying on salary history information, including compensation and benefits, about an applicant for employment. Agents of the employer—including headhunters and recruiters—are likewise prohibited from seeking salary history information. While the law states that employers may still consider or rely on salary history information if it is voluntarily provided by the applicant, without prompting, employers should be cautious about doing so unless they can clearly demonstrate that the information was volunteered, without prompting, by the applicant. The new law also requires employers to provide applicants, upon reasonable request, with a pay scale for the positions they seek.
The legislation, which adds Section 432.3 to California’s Labor Code, will go into effect on January 1, 2018. California employers should therefore move quickly to revise employment applications as needed, and to provide appropriate training to Human Resources professionals, recruiters, and others involved in the recruitment and hiring process.
California joins Massachusetts, Oregon, Delaware, Puerto Rico, San Francisco, and New York City in passing laws which ban employers from inquiring about an applicant’s current or former salaries – a trend that we expect to continue throughout the country. Implementation of a comparable law in Philadelphia is currently stayed pending a federal lawsuit by the Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce on grounds that it violates the First Amendment, the Due Process Clause, the Commerce Clause, and Pennsylvania’s Constitution.
Gov. Brown has yet to make a decision regarding AB 1209, the Gender Pay Gap Transparency Act, which the Senate approved on September 11, 2017. That bill, if signed, would require employers to collect data on the mean and median salaries paid to women and men with the same job title or description, which information would be published by the Secretary of State and thus available to the public. We continue to monitor the status of this and other laws impacting employers.
For further information or advice concerning compliance with state and local salary history ban laws, please contact the professional(s) listed below, or your regular Crowell & Moring contact.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25
On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25



