An Indefinite Article "A" Or "An" Means "One Or More"
Client Alert | 1 min read | 01.17.08
In Baldwin Graphic Systems v. Siebert (No. 07-1262, January 15, 2008), a Federal Circuit panel reaffirms that an indefinite article “a” or “an” carries the meaning of “one or more” in open-ended claims containing the transitional phrase “comprising.” At issue is a district court’s claim construction that the term “a pre-soaked fabric roll” means “a single pre-soaked fabric roll.” In reversing the district court, the Federal Circuit concludes “[t]hat ‘a’ or ‘an’ can mean ‘one or more’ is best described as a rule, rather than merely as a presumption or even a convention.” The exceptions to this rule are extremely limited; a patentee must evince a clear intent to limit ”a” or “an” to “one”.
The panel also notes that “[a]n exception to the general rule that ‘a’ or ‘an’ means more than one only arises where the language of the claims themselves, the specification, or the prosecution history necessitate a departure from the rule.” The subsequent use of the definite articles “the” or “said” in a claim to refer back to the same claim term is not deemed to change the general plural rule, but simply reinvokes that non-singular meaning.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 07.02.24
SEC’s Private Fund Advisers Rule Vacated by the Fifth Circuit
The Private Fund Rules were the most comprehensive set of regulations for the private funds industry since the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (“Dodd-Frank”). On June 5, 2024, a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (“Fifth Circuit”) vacated the Private Fund Adviser Rules (“Private Fund Rules”).
Client Alert | 3 min read | 07.02.24
Client Alert | 3 min read | 07.01.24
Nationwide Injunction Halts Key Provisions of Davis-Bacon Act Regulations
Client Alert | 12 min read | 06.28.24