1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |All Aboard: New York Enacts The Women on Corporate Board Study Act

All Aboard: New York Enacts The Women on Corporate Board Study Act

Client Alert | 2 min read | 02.05.20

On December 30, 2019, New York State Governor Cuomo signed S4278, amending the state’s Business Corporation Law in order to conduct a study of the number of women who serve on boards of directors of business corporations. The New York Department of State, in collaboration with the Department of Taxation and Finance, will now require all domestic and foreign business corporations authorized to do business in the state to report the number of women who serve on their board of directors on their Biennial Statement filed with the Department of State. By February 1, 2022, the Department of State will publish a report on the findings of this study on its website, and continue doing so every four years thereafter. The study will include the number of women directors and the total number of directors that constitute the board of each corporation, an analysis of the change in number of women directors from previous years, and the aggregate percentage of women directors on all such boards of directors.

This study is intended to be a step toward increasing inclusion of women in the corporate arena. According to a study by the nonprofit organization 2020 Women on Boards, in the United States, women hold about 20% of board seats at companies listed in the Russell 3000 Index.

Some companies have already taken action to increase board diversity. For example, Goldman Sachs announced that moving forward, it will no longer take companies public unless there’s at least one diverse board candidate, with a focus on women. Likewise, BlackRock stated in a new set of proxy voting guidelines posted on its website that it wants its portfolio companies to have diverse boards and that it would normally expect to see at least two women directors on every board.

Peterson Institute study found that the presence of women in corporate leadership positions may improve firm performance, while a study by McKinsey found that the most gender-diverse companies are 15% more likely to outperform their peers. As the authors of the McKinsey study noted, while correlation does not equal causation (i.e. greater gender and ethnic diversity in corporate leadership doesn’t automatically translate into higher profits), the correlation does indicate that when companies commit themselves to diverse leadership, they are more successful. 

New York is not the first state focused on such diversity initiatives. In 2018, California passed legislation requiring that all publicly-held domestic or foreign corporations whose principal executive offices are located in California have at least one female director on their boards by December 31, 2019, either by filling an open seat or by adding a seat. Legislation relating to women on boards has also been proposed or enacted in other states, including Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania.

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25

A Sign of What’s to Come? Court Dismisses FCA Retaliation Complaint Based on Alleged Discriminatory Use of Federal Funding

On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future....