Stephen M. Byers

Partner

Overview

For more than 30 years, clients have trusted Stephen Byers to help them navigate complex high-stakes government investigations, conduct sensitive internal investigations, and, when necessary, successfully litigate related disputes.  In matters ranging from civil False Claims Act cases to federal grand jury investigations, clients operating in highly regulated environments such as government contracting rely on Steve to understand their business imperatives, craft thoughtful defense strategies, and rigorously execute on those strategies to achieve optimal outcomes.

Steve represents individuals and business entities in all phases of white-collar criminal and related civil matters, including: internal corporate investigations; federal grand jury, inspector general, civil enforcement and congressional investigations; and trials and appeals.  His practice focuses on matters involving procurement fraud, trade secrets theft, international trade enforcement, and cybercrime. Steve has extensive experience with the federal False Claims Act and qui tam litigation, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the Economic Espionage Act, and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

In addition to defense of government investigations and prosecutions, Steve has represented corporate victims of trade secrets theft, cybercrime, and other offenses. For example, he represented a Fortune 100 U.S. company in parallel civil and criminal proceedings that resulted in a $275 million criminal restitution order against a foreign competitor upon its conviction for trade secrets theft.

Steve's trial experience includes the acquittal of a major transportation company accused of filing false reports with a federal agency; and the acquittal of a senior executive of a major pharmaceutical company charged with conspiracy, obstruction, and other crimes.

Steve's experience in e-discovery includes counseling clients on electronic discovery issues in the context of internal and government investigations, including the use of technology-assisted review and computer forensics as investigative tools, and negotiating with government investigators concerning the preservation, processing, and production of electronically stored information. Steve has written and spoken widely on e-discovery issues in the context of criminal investigations, and previously served as the chair of the ABA Criminal Justice Section's Task Force on Criminal E-Discovery.

Steve is a partner in the firm's White Collar and Regulatory Enforcement Group and has long served on the group's steering committee. He is also a member of the firm's Government Contracts Group and E-Discovery and Information Management Group.

Steve received his law degree in 1992 from the University of Virginia School of Law, where he served on the editorial board of the Virginia Law Review.

Steve is a member of the bar of the District of Columbia, the bars of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and other federal courts, and the American Bar Association Sections on Criminal Justice and Public Contract Law.

Career & Education

|
    • Wake Forest University, B.A., cum laude, 1987
    • University of Virginia School of Law, J.D., 1992
    • Wake Forest University, B.A., cum laude, 1987
    • University of Virginia School of Law, J.D., 1992
    • District of Columbia
    • U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
    • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
    • District of Columbia
    • U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
    • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Stephen's Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.11.24

Allegations of a Litany of Lyin’: Penn State Settles Claims of Cybersecurity Noncompliance

On October 22, 2024, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that Pennsylvania State University (Penn State) will pay $1.25 million to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Act (FCA) by failing to comply with contractually mandated cybersecurity requirements by the Department of Defense (DoD) and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).  The announcement marks the most recent settlement under DOJ’s Civil Cyber-Fraud Initiative although, unlike prior settlements, there is no allegation of a cybersecurity incident or breach that was related to or caused by the contractor’s alleged noncompliance....

Representative Matters

|

Procurement Fraud

  • Represent Fortune 100 defense contractor in internal investigation, disclosure, and government investigation of allegedly defective aircraft parts supplied to the U.S. military.
  • Represent large government contractor in internal investigation, disclosure and government investigation of alleged extensive misconduct at recently acquired subsidiary, including alleged bribery of government officials, labor mischarging, and false representations in contract proposals.
  • Represented Fortune 500 government contractor in internal investigation, disclosure and federal criminal investigation of alleged small-business fraud, kickbacks and related misconduct, resulting in criminal conviction of former executive and $5 million mandatory restitution award to client company.
  • Represented Fortune 100 transportation company in parallel criminal and civil fraud investigations of alleged massive overcharging of federal government based on misrepresentations of contract performance.
  • Represented government IT contractor and its owners in federal grand jury investigation of alleged small-business fraud and bribery, resulting in criminal conviction of joint-venture partner but no adverse action against client.
  • Represented multinational document-management company in internal investigation, disclosure, and federal grand jury investigation of potential bribery of federal contracting officer by former employee, resulting in no adverse action against client.
  • Represented multinational information management and digital solutions provider in internal investigation and disclosures to government customers regarding failure to comply with federal cybersecurity requirements, resulting in no adverse action against client.
  • Represented multinational document-management company in internal investigation, disclosure, and federal grand jury investigation of potential bribery of federal contracting officer by former employee, resulting in no adverse action against client.
  • Represent major provider of IT systems and services to federal government in numerous internal investigations involving a variety of issues including alleged cyber security breaches, physical security breaches, labor mischarging, and falsified documentation of contract performance.
  • Represented war zone defense contractor in internal investigation and related congressional investigation of various inflammatory public allegations including human trafficking and labor mischarging.
  • Represented former employee of national consulting firm in parallel criminal and civil fraud investigations of alleged overcharging based on Cost Accounting Standards violations.
  • Represented Fortune 100 defense contractor in federal grand jury investigation of alleged falsification of testing documentation for military aircraft parts; government closed investigation with no action taken against client.
  • Represented defense contractor in internal investigation and disclosure of alleged falsification of destructive-testing documentation for military safety gear; government closed investigation with no action taken against client.
  • Represented military hardware manufacturer in internal investigation of criminal small-business fraud, including assessment and formulation of strategy for potential disclosures.
  • Represented university board of trustees in internal investigation of alleged federal research grant mischarging and kickbacks.

False Claims Act - Government Contracts

  • Represented Fortune 500 defense contractor in FCA investigation of alleged overcharging based on Cost Accounting Standards violations; convinced government to close investigation with no adverse action taken against client.
  • Represented manufacturer of military hardware in FCA investigation of false claims based on provision of allegedly defective products; convinced government to close investigation with no adverse action taken against client.
  • Represent global technology company in FCA investigation of alleged failure to comply with cybersecurity requirements in $700 million government contract.
  • Represent Fortune 500 defense contractor in FCA investigation of alleged failure to comply with cost accounting requirements in connection with $800 million contract with the U.S. military.
  • Represent Fortune 100 defense contractor in parallel civil FCA and criminal investigation of allegedly defective aircraft parts supplied to the U.S. military.
  • Represented Fortune 500 defense contractor in government investigation of extensive alleged FCA violations based on failure to comply with and false certifications related to Qualified Product List requirements; case settled on favorable terms.
  • Represented large engineering and construction firm in qui tam action and FCA investigation of overcharging based on violations of the Truth in Negotiations Act; case settled on favorable terms, with vast majority of settlement payment focused on non-fraud contract claims.
  • Represented medical-device company in qui tam action and FCA investigation of alleged overcharging under federal supply schedule contracts; case settled on favorable terms.
  • Represented Fortune 100 transportation company in parallel criminal and FCA investigations of alleged massive overcharging of federal government based on misrepresentations of contract performance; settled as civil case on favorable terms.
  • Represented Fortune 500 transportation company in FCA investigation of overcharging based on misrepresentation of contract performance; convinced government to drop FCA investigation and resolve as contract dispute.
  • Represented Fortune 500 transportation company in FCA qui tam litigation based on allegations of labor and material mischarging; won motion to dismiss that dispensed with case.
  • Represented large U.K. defense contractor in FCA investigation and qui tam litigation based on allegations of widespread labor and material overcharging on USAF contracts; case settled on favorable terms.
  • Represented Fortune 100 defense contractor in related FCA qui tam actions concerning accounting for asset depreciation and self-insurance costs; cases settled on favorable terms.

False Claims Act - Health Care

  • Represented regional health system in FCA qui tam action based on alleged pervasive Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statute violations; won motion to dismiss that forced relator to settle for nuisance value.
  • Represented regional health system in FCA qui tam action based on alleged medically unnecessary procedures and upcoding; settled for nominal amount.
  • Represented trade association of leading health systems for purposes of filing amicus brief in U.S. Supreme Court supporting granting writ of certiorari in FCA case with industry-wide implications.

PPP Loan Fraud

  • Represent CEO of defense contractor in high-profile investigation of alleged bank fraud in connection with Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans.

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

  • Represented aviation company in criminal investigation of bribes paid to Middle Eastern customer; convinced DOJ to decline prosecution of client.
  • Represented Fortune 500 telecommunications company in internal investigation of alleged rampant bribery in AsiaPac region, and recommended compliance program improvements.
  • Represented large multinational medical device company in comprehensive revamping of all aspects of anti-corruption compliance program.
  • Represented Fortune 100 chemical and life sciences company for purposes of counseling on a variety of anti-corruption issues arising in China.

Trade Secrets Theft and Cybercrime

  • Represented global oil-and-gas sector company in internal investigation of alleged misappropriation and use of sealed bidding information improperly acquired from customer employees by alleged corrupt foreign sales agent.
  • Represented Fortune 100 company, which was victim of extensive trade secrets theft, in complex parallel civil and criminal proceedings; foreign competitor ultimately pleaded guilty to trade secrets theft and paid client $275 million in criminal restitution.
  • Represented CEO of high tech company in criminal prosecution for hacking into competitor's computer system; following guilty plea, client was sentenced to 2 months of incarceration despite Sentencing Guidelines range of, and government request for, a sentence from 18 to 24 months.
  • Represented national consulting firm in investigating and resolving trade secrets theft by former employee.
  • Represented Fortune 100 chemical and life sciences company in parallel civil and criminal proceedings against employee for theft of trade secrets.
  • Represented large multinational defense contractor in investigating and resolving trade secrets theft by former employee.

Antitrust

  • Represented European national airline in global cartel investigation, including DOJ investigation of criminal Sherman Act violations based on alleged price-fixing in air cargo industry and related offenses including obstruction of justice; matter resolved through negotiated guilty plea.
  • Represented joint venture between major chemical companies in DOJ investigation of criminal Sherman Act violations based on alleged price-fixing and customer allocation in synthetic fibers markets; matter resolved through negotiated guilty plea.
  • Represented multinational auto parts manufacturer in DOJ investigation of criminal Sherman Act violations based on alleged price-fixing in aftermarket parts market; investigation closed with no adverse action taken against client.
  • Represented Fortune 100 chemical company in DOJ investigation of criminal Sherman Act violations based on alleged price-fixing in aftermarket automotive paint market; investigation closed with no adverse action taken against client.
  • Represented two individuals in DOJ investigation of criminal Sherman Act violations based on alleged price-fixing in residential doors market; no adverse action taken against clients.

Export Control and Sanctions

  • Represent publicly-trade electronic systems company in investigation and disclosure of U.S. sanctions violations involving sales to entities in Myanmar.
  • Represent publicly-traded technology company in responding to Office of Export Controls investigation of pirated use of export-controlled software in sanctioned countries.
  • Represent Fortune 500 company in grand jury investigation of alleged sales of electronic equipment to blacklisted Russian entities.
  • Represented various global insurance companies in responding to grand jury subpoenas in connection with federal investigation of Russian sanctions violations and seizure of Russian oligarch assets.
  • Represented individual in criminal investigation and prosecution of export control violations based on alleged transshipments of forklifts to Iran; secured cooperation agreement granting client immunity from prosecution.
  • Represented individual in criminal investigation of export control violations based on alleged transshipments of aircraft parts to Iran; no adverse action taken against client.

Public Integrity

  • Represent CEO of defense contractor in federal grand jury investigation of allegedly improper campaign contributions to sitting members of the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate.
  • Represented multinational document-management company in internal investigation, disclosure, and federal grand jury investigation of potential bribery of federal contracting officer by former employee; no adverse action taken against client.
  • Represented federal SES employee in long-running investigation of alleged contempt of court and false statements by numerous agency personnel; no adverse action taken against client.
  • Represented two high-ranking White House officials in several parallel congressional and criminal investigations; no adverse action taken against clients.
  • Represented former high-ranking DOJ official in investigation and prosecution by Independent Counsel; matter resolved on eve of trial through guilty plea on favorable terms.

Trials

  • Represented pharmaceutical company vice president through investigation and trial of alleged criminal violations of FDA rules and regulations and obstruction of a federal proceeding; client acquitted.
  • Represented Fortune 500 transportation company in investigation and trial of alleged criminal false statements and certifications to a federal agency; client acquitted.

Stephen's Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.11.24

Allegations of a Litany of Lyin’: Penn State Settles Claims of Cybersecurity Noncompliance

On October 22, 2024, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that Pennsylvania State University (Penn State) will pay $1.25 million to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Act (FCA) by failing to comply with contractually mandated cybersecurity requirements by the Department of Defense (DoD) and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).  The announcement marks the most recent settlement under DOJ’s Civil Cyber-Fraud Initiative although, unlike prior settlements, there is no allegation of a cybersecurity incident or breach that was related to or caused by the contractor’s alleged noncompliance....

|

Stephen's Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.11.24

Allegations of a Litany of Lyin’: Penn State Settles Claims of Cybersecurity Noncompliance

On October 22, 2024, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that Pennsylvania State University (Penn State) will pay $1.25 million to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Act (FCA) by failing to comply with contractually mandated cybersecurity requirements by the Department of Defense (DoD) and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).  The announcement marks the most recent settlement under DOJ’s Civil Cyber-Fraud Initiative although, unlike prior settlements, there is no allegation of a cybersecurity incident or breach that was related to or caused by the contractor’s alleged noncompliance....