Karel Bourgeois

Partner

Overview

Clients turn to Karel Bourgeois to manage their competition risks, and they value his pragmatic approach and commercial understanding. Karel’s practice focuses on EU and Belgian competition law, foreign direct investment screening, and the regulation of state aid and subsidies.

Karel steers clients through merger control, cartel, and abuse proceedings before the European Commission, the Belgian Competition Authority, and other global regulators. Clients also seek his advice on how to realize their projects in compliance with antitrust and competition law.

With his extensive knowledge of state aid, Karel helps clients navigate state aid proceedings before the EC and advises them on strategic state aid and foreign subsidies issues. He regularly represents clients in national and EU courts in competition and state aid cases.

Karel represents clients in a range of industries, with significant experience in the telecommunications, media, energy, and health care sectors.

Karel is a regular speaker at competition law conferences and is the author of the standard book on Belgian merger control.

Career & Education

|
    • University of Antwerp, L.B., magna cum laude, 2000
    • Catholic University of Leuven, M.L., magna cum laude, 2003
    • University of Chicago Law School, LL.M., 2004
    • University of Antwerp, L.B., magna cum laude, 2000
    • Catholic University of Leuven, M.L., magna cum laude, 2003
    • University of Chicago Law School, LL.M., 2004
    • Belgium
    • European Court
    • Belgium
    • European Court
    • Dutch
    • English
    • French
    • German
    • Dutch
    • English
    • French
    • German
Karel Bourgeois is an excellent lawyer and very pleasant to work with. He understands the paramount importance of the matters he advises on. He is very dedicated and frankly proven [to be] the best support when stakes are high. He is smart, inventive, calm, understands office politics and priorities, and gets the job done!

The Legal 500 EMEA, Competition: EU and Global, 2022

Karel's Insights

Client Alert | 15 min read | 10.15.24

The European Commission’s Draft Guidelines on Exclusionary Abuses: Towards Stricter Enforcement?

On August 1, 2024, the European Commission published its draft Guidelines on abusive exclusionary conduct by dominant undertakings. Their adoption would mark the first major update in over 15 years of the Commission’s guidance on the application of the prohibition of abuse of dominance laid down in Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The Commission’s 2008 Guidance on enforcement priorities in applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty to abusive exclusionary conduct by dominant undertakings, which received only a limited update in 2023, were once hailed as a welcome move away from a legalistic, form-based approach to an effects-based approached informed by economics. Is the pendulum now swinging back to a more formalistic approach based on presumptions, shifting the burden of proof onto dominant undertakings and heralding an era of stricter enforcement?...

|

Karel's Insights

Client Alert | 15 min read | 10.15.24

The European Commission’s Draft Guidelines on Exclusionary Abuses: Towards Stricter Enforcement?

On August 1, 2024, the European Commission published its draft Guidelines on abusive exclusionary conduct by dominant undertakings. Their adoption would mark the first major update in over 15 years of the Commission’s guidance on the application of the prohibition of abuse of dominance laid down in Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The Commission’s 2008 Guidance on enforcement priorities in applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty to abusive exclusionary conduct by dominant undertakings, which received only a limited update in 2023, were once hailed as a welcome move away from a legalistic, form-based approach to an effects-based approached informed by economics. Is the pendulum now swinging back to a more formalistic approach based on presumptions, shifting the burden of proof onto dominant undertakings and heralding an era of stricter enforcement?...