Jeremy Iloulian
Areas of Focus
Overview
Recognized as a “Rising Star” in International Trade by Super Lawyers, Jeremy Iloulian advises clients globally on complex cross-border regulatory, compliance, investigative, and transactional matters and policy developments that touch U.S. national security and international trade. He focuses on U.S. export controls (Export Administration Regulations [EAR] and International Traffic in Arms Regulations [ITAR]), economic sanctions, supply chain security (ICTS), anti-boycott laws, foreign investment (CFIUS and outbound investment), and various government contract national security restrictions associated with supply chains (Chinese military company analyses) and fundamental research (NSPM-33, foreign talent programs).
Career & Education
- United Nations
Legal Intern, Office of Legal Affairs, Division for Ocean Affairs and Law of the Sea, Summer 2016 - Department of State
Intern, Office of Science and Technology Cooperation, Spring 2013 - Embassy of Iraq
Intern, American Administration Outreach, Summer 2011
- United Nations
- Duke University School of Law, J.D., 2018
- The George Washington University, B.A., cum Laude, International Affairs & Environmental Studies, 2013
- Illinois
- District of Columbia
- Steering Group Member, Export Controls and Economic Sanctions Committee, American Bar Association International Law Section
Jeremy's Insights
Client Alert | 8 min read | 02.21.25
Cartels, Foreign Terrorist Organizations, and the High Stakes for Businesses
The new Trump administration is focusing intensely on “cartels” and other transnational criminal organizations, particularly in the Western Hemisphere. Many of the entities designated as FTOs today are active in Latin America and the United States, and sometimes seek to extort money or have other dealings with legitimate businesses operating in their territories. The State Department’s designation of eight such entities will not only raise the pressure on the entities designated, but also will create new risks and pressures for companies operating in areas where these FTOs are active. Below, we summarize the recent developments and the ramifications of these designations for businesses.
Client Alert | 6 min read | 02.07.25
“Maximum Pressure” on Iran Is Back: What This Means for Sanctions and Export Controls
Publication | 01.24.25
DOD Changes To List Of Chinese Military Companies May Impact Suppliers, Contractors
Representative Matters
Strategic Guidance and Crisis Situations
- Provided weekly guidance to a top 10 U.S. private equity firm on investments in, and exposure to, high-risk markets (e.g. China, Russia).
- Developed and implemented an assessment of a U.S. private equity firm’s portfolio companies for compliance with U.S. trade and national security laws.
- Fashioned an export-compliant Russia-exit strategy for an EU-based financial institution.
- Advised a South Korean technology company on ongoing operations and support in Russia.
Internal Investigations
- Represented a U.S. government contractor for an internal investigation and voluntary self-disclosure to BIS and NSD regarding exports to China, Russia, and other locations in Europe, as well as the Middle East and Asia, with investigation touchpoints in the United States, Europe, Southeast Asia, and East Asia.
- Represented a Southeast Asia-based technology company for an internal investigation and voluntary self-disclosure to OFAC regarding transactions involving Cuba and Iran, with investigation touchpoints in the United States, South Asia, Southeast Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East.
- Represented a U.S. academic institution for an internal investigation and voluntary self-disclosure to BIS and DOE regarding potential exports to export-restricted parties and potential implications of foreign talent program requirements.
- Represented a UK-based and U.S.-owned media company for an internal investigation and voluntary self-disclosure to OFAC and BIS regarding sales to Cuba and Iran, with investigation touchpoints in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Latin America.
- Represented a U.S.-based technology company for responding to OFAC subpoenas regarding provision of services and technology to U.S. sanctioned persons, with investigation touchpoints in the United States, Europe, Asia, and Australia.
- Represented a U.S.-based technology company for an internal investigation and voluntary self-disclosure to BIS regarding transactions involving export-restricted parties with investigation touchpoints in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Asia, and Australia.
- Represented a U.S.-based freight forwarder for an internal investigation and voluntary self-disclosure to OFAC with investigation touchpoints in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Asia, and Latin America.
Transactions
Jeremy has counseled on international trade and national security considerations for over 300 mergers, acquisitions, and minority investments, and hundreds of credit financing arrangements. Examples include:
- Advised a U.S. private equity firm on its $11 billion sale of a mortgage technology company.
- Advised a U.S. private equity firm on its $1.4 billion strategic investment in an electric services company.
- Advised a Canadian pension fund company on its $400 million strategic investment in a U.S. provider of security systems and services.
- Advised a U.S. aerospace company on its $675 million de-SPAC processes.
- Advised a U.S. strategic investor in acquiring a minority investment of an entity, whereby another minority investment was a U.S. sanctioned person.
Regulatory Counseling
- Developed summary of exposure to high-risk Chinese entities for a telecommunications company and risk of enforcement of the Information and Communications Technology and Services (ICTS) supply chain regulations.
- Counseled a U.S. manufacturer on exports of manufacturing base to Mexico and Brazil.
- Created framework for a U.S. contracting firm to build out operations in Saudi Arabia and the associated EAR, ITAR, and government contracting risks.
- Drafted a memorandum for an EU-based financial institution, and summarized risks and potential mechanisms to achieve compliance with U.S. export controls and BIS expectations.
Government Licensing/Advocacy
- Successfully advocated to the U.S. Department of Defense on behalf of a U.S. defense contractor that the components utilized of Chinese origin did not violate provisions of the DFARs.
- Regularly assists companies in applying for and receiving U.S. export and sanctions licenses. Recent examples include: BIS export licenses for the export of medical products to 700+ parties in Russia, BIS export license for the export of machinery to Russia, OFAC specific licenses for an Iranian non-profit to receive donations, and OFAC specific licenses to winddown operations with a sanctioned Chinese party.
Development of Compliance Infrastructure
- Developed, enhanced, and implemented sanctions, export controls (EAR and ITAR), anti-corruption (FCPA), and anti-money laundering (AML) compliance policies and procedures for numerous companies and nonprofits across a diverse set of industries.
- Conducted training and drafted training modules for company personnel regarding compliance with sanctions, export controls, anti-corruption, and AML laws.
- Analyzed potential export control risks (EAR and ITAR) and develop specific compliance structured for non-U.S. persons employed at facilities in the United States.
Jeremy's Insights
Client Alert | 8 min read | 02.21.25
Cartels, Foreign Terrorist Organizations, and the High Stakes for Businesses
The new Trump administration is focusing intensely on “cartels” and other transnational criminal organizations, particularly in the Western Hemisphere. Many of the entities designated as FTOs today are active in Latin America and the United States, and sometimes seek to extort money or have other dealings with legitimate businesses operating in their territories. The State Department’s designation of eight such entities will not only raise the pressure on the entities designated, but also will create new risks and pressures for companies operating in areas where these FTOs are active. Below, we summarize the recent developments and the ramifications of these designations for businesses.
Client Alert | 6 min read | 02.07.25
“Maximum Pressure” on Iran Is Back: What This Means for Sanctions and Export Controls
Publication | 01.24.25
DOD Changes To List Of Chinese Military Companies May Impact Suppliers, Contractors
Recognition
- Super Lawyers: Illinois Rising Stars for 2024 and 2025, International
Jeremy's Insights
Client Alert | 8 min read | 02.21.25
Cartels, Foreign Terrorist Organizations, and the High Stakes for Businesses
The new Trump administration is focusing intensely on “cartels” and other transnational criminal organizations, particularly in the Western Hemisphere. Many of the entities designated as FTOs today are active in Latin America and the United States, and sometimes seek to extort money or have other dealings with legitimate businesses operating in their territories. The State Department’s designation of eight such entities will not only raise the pressure on the entities designated, but also will create new risks and pressures for companies operating in areas where these FTOs are active. Below, we summarize the recent developments and the ramifications of these designations for businesses.
Client Alert | 6 min read | 02.07.25
“Maximum Pressure” on Iran Is Back: What This Means for Sanctions and Export Controls
Publication | 01.24.25
DOD Changes To List Of Chinese Military Companies May Impact Suppliers, Contractors
Insights
DOD Changes To List Of Chinese Military Companies May Impact Suppliers, Contractors
|01.24.25
Westlaw Today
- |
06.15.23
Government Contracting Law Report
- |
11.01.22
The Banking Law Journal
NAFA Transactional Integrity Webinar: Navigating Russian Sanctions
|06.05.24
Red Flags: Navigating the Hurricane (2024 Corporate Counsel Section CLE)
|02.02.24
Treasury, Commerce Alert May Lead To More Diligence Steps, Affect Disclosures, Law Firm Says
|07.14.22
Export Compliance Daily (subscription required)
China Technology Transfer Control Act Introduced to Strengthen Export Controls vis-à-vis China
|02.20.25
Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Law
Parting Shots by Biden Administration in the Form of Sweeping New Russia Sanctions
|01.21.25
Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Law
OFAC Issues New Syria General License and Updates FAQs
|01.09.25
Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Law
- |
09.18.24
Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Law
OFAC Extends Recordkeeping Requirements from 5 to 10 Years Through Interim Final Rule
|09.12.24
Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Law
- |
08.16.24
Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Law
ITAR and EAR Proposed Rules Expand Controls on U.S. Person Services
|07.25.24
Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Law
OFAC Sanctions Shadow Banking Network for Iran Military
|06.26.24
Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Law
U.S. Tightens Sanctions on Russia, Now Targeting Companies Based in China
|05.06.24
Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Law
New U.S. Sanctions and Export Controls Imposed on Iran Following Recent Attacks on Israel
|04.22.24
Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Law
Practices
- Export Controls
- Economic Sanctions
- National Security
- International Trade
- International Trade Investigations
- Supply Chain Management
- Economic Sanctions and Insurance
- Antiboycott Laws
- Investigations
- Aviation
- Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS)
- White Collar and Regulatory Enforcement
- Transportation
- Mergers and Acquisitions
Jeremy's Insights
Client Alert | 8 min read | 02.21.25
Cartels, Foreign Terrorist Organizations, and the High Stakes for Businesses
The new Trump administration is focusing intensely on “cartels” and other transnational criminal organizations, particularly in the Western Hemisphere. Many of the entities designated as FTOs today are active in Latin America and the United States, and sometimes seek to extort money or have other dealings with legitimate businesses operating in their territories. The State Department’s designation of eight such entities will not only raise the pressure on the entities designated, but also will create new risks and pressures for companies operating in areas where these FTOs are active. Below, we summarize the recent developments and the ramifications of these designations for businesses.
Client Alert | 6 min read | 02.07.25
“Maximum Pressure” on Iran Is Back: What This Means for Sanctions and Export Controls
Publication | 01.24.25
DOD Changes To List Of Chinese Military Companies May Impact Suppliers, Contractors